143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33230658)
1. 3D pelvimetry and biometric measurements: a surgical perspective for colorectal resections.
Lorenzon L; Bini F; Landolfi F; Quinzi S; Balducci G; Marinozzi F; Biondi A; Persiani R; D'Ugo D; Tirelli F; Iannicelli E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 May; 36(5):977-986. PubMed ID: 33230658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Yamaoka Y; Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furutani A; Manabe S; Torii K; Koido K; Mori K
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):557-566. PubMed ID: 30006838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pelvic inlet shape measured by three-dimensional pelvimetry is a predictor of the operative time in the anterior resection of rectal cancer.
Shimada T; Tsuruta M; Hasegawa H; Okabayashi K; Ishida T; Asada Y; Suzumura H; Kitagawa Y
Surg Today; 2018 Jan; 48(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 28597348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision].
Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer.
Zhou XC; Su M; Hu KQ; Su YF; Ye YH; Huang CQ; Yu ZL; Li XY; Zhou H; Ni YZ; Jiang YI; Lou Z
Oncol Lett; 2016 Jan; 11(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of normal pelvis morphometry of modern Chinese southern Han female and its correlation with age].
Liu P; Yu YH; Chen CL; Tang YX; Wang L; Mao DR; Xu YK; Chen L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 24284215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.
Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision.
Ferko A; Malý O; Örhalmi J; Dolejš J
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1164-71. PubMed ID: 26123334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sacrococcygeal dimensions and curvature are associated with resection quality in rectal cancer excision.
Simpson G; Marks T; Blacker S; Smith D; Walsh C
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 32594270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pelvic differences between brachycephalic and mesaticephalic cats and indirect pelvimetry assessment.
Monteiro CL; Campos AI; Madeira VL; Silva HV; Freire LM; Pinto JN; de Souza LP; da Silva LD
Vet Rec; 2013 Jan; 172(1):16. PubMed ID: 23118051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of pelvimetry on anastomotic leakage in a consecutive series of open, laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Bertani E; Chiappa A; Della Vigna P; Radice D; Papis D; Cossu L; Biffi R; Bianchi PP; Luca F; Andreoni B
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 61(134):1574-81. PubMed ID: 25436345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry predicts the technical difficulty of rectal surgery.
Ma Q; Cheng J; Bao Y; Gao Z; Jiang K; Wang S; Ye Y; Wang Y; Shen Z
Asian J Surg; 2022 Dec; 45(12):2626-2632. PubMed ID: 34961711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvic and Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Anatomical Characterization of the Average Male.
Saffarzadeh M; Eckert CE; Nagle D; Weaner LS; Waters GS; Levine EA; Weaver AA
Surg Innov; 2019 Apr; 26(2):180-191. PubMed ID: 30417742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of transabdominal total mesorectal excision difficulty according to the angle of pelvic floor muscle.
Lee JM; Han YD; Cho MS; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jul; 34(7):3043-3050. PubMed ID: 31482361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T
Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Obstetric pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant Japanese women: a retrospective single-center study.
Nishikawa S; Miki M; Chigusa Y; Furuta M; Kido A; Kawamura Y; Ueda Y; Mandai M; Mogami H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2190444. PubMed ID: 36927362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomographic pelvimetry in English bulldogs.
Dobak TP; Voorhout G; Vernooij JCM; Boroffka SAEB
Theriogenology; 2018 Sep; 118():144-149. PubMed ID: 29906664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerised Tomography Analysis of Pelvic Inlet and Outlet Fluoroscopic View Angles.
Aydın D; Sarı E; Erler K
Indian J Orthop; 2020 Sep; 54(5):687-694. PubMed ID: 32850034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Zur Hausen G; Gröne J; Kaufmann D; Niehues SM; Aschenbrenner K; Stroux A; Hamm B; Kreis ME; Lauscher JC
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 28315018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
