These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3323112)

  • 1. [Use of a fully mechanized differentiation system in the hematologic laboratory. II: Reproducibility and reliability of the differentiation of pathologic blood pictures with the Hematrak 590].
    Grunewald RW; Schauseil S; Rick W
    Internist (Berl); 1987 Nov; 28(11):756-67. PubMed ID: 3323112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Use of a fully mechanized differentiation system in the hematologic laboratory. I: Development and mechanisms of the Hematrak 590 differentiation system; reproducibility and reliability of differentiation of smears with normal blood cell elements].
    Grunewald RW; Schauseil S; Rick W
    Internist (Berl); 1987 Oct; 28(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 3316100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a new blood cell counter with sheath flow system.
    Tatsumi N; Tsuda I; Fujimoto K; Matsumoto H
    Cytometry; 1985 Sep; 6(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 4042782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mechanization and automation of routine hematologic studies].
    Ludwig U; Gräser W; Knodel W
    Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1972; 6():163-9. PubMed ID: 4536520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative buffy coat analysis. A new laboratory tool functioning as a screening complete blood cell count.
    Wardlaw SC; Levine RA
    JAMA; 1983 Feb; 249(5):617-20. PubMed ID: 6848870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automatization of differential leukocyte counts with image analyzer. Comparison between three apparatus (author's transl)].
    Praloran V; Bouffette P; Daniel MT; Flandrin G
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1981 Sep; 29(7):442-52. PubMed ID: 7027151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Further evolution and leukocyte differential using an automated blood cell counter].
    Takubo T; Tatsumi N
    Rinsho Byori; 1995 Sep; 43(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 7474456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analytical evaluation of an automated hematologic analyzer: Cell Dyn 3500].
    Sanzari M; De Toni S; D'Osualdo A; Floriani F; Plebani M
    Minerva Med; 1996 Mar; 87(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8668289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated differential leucocyte counters: an evaluation of the Hemalog D and A comparison with the Hematrak. II. Evaluation of performance on routine blood samples from hospital patients.
    Bain BJ; Scott D; Scott TJ
    Pathology; 1980 Jan; 12(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 7375140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical usefulness of automated hematology analyzer system for WHO classification of hematological neoplasia].
    Nagai K; Tsuruta K; Tomonaga M; Kamihira S
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jun; Suppl 126():17-25. PubMed ID: 12905937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total nucleated cell differential for blood and bone marrow using a single tube in a five-color flow cytometer.
    Björnsson S; Wahlström S; Norström E; Bernevi I; O'Neill U; Johansson E; Runström H; Simonsson P
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 18061952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advances in automated blood counting.
    Bessman JD
    Hematol Pathol; 1987; 1(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 3332875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Automated blood cell differentiation by the Hematrak].
    Witte S
    Fortschr Med; 1979 Mar; 97(12):543-4. PubMed ID: 437623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the Technicon H-6000 automated system for executing hemograms and differential leukocyte counts].
    Jou JM; Vives Corrons JL; Insa MJ; Fernández G; Colomer E; del Olmo J; Seuma J; Ester A; Pérez Vila E
    Sangre (Barc); 1984; 29(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 6719321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Coulter LH 750 in a hospital reference laboratory.
    Aulesa C; Pastor I; Naranjo D; Piqueras J; Galimany R
    Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 12661824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No correlation between reticulocyte count and erythroblast count.
    Tatsumi N; Niri M; Tsuda I
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1992; 14(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 1376223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytic performance of the PENTRA 80 automated blood cell analyzer for the evaluation of normal and pathologic WBCs.
    Arroyo ME; Tabernero MD; García-Marcos MA; Orfao A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 15842044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Analytical and technical reliability of the ELT-8 laser hematologic counter].
    Bauersfeld W; Knoll E; Wisser H
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1985 Apr; 23(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 4009133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complete analytical and diagnostic performances of the Abbott Cell Dyn 3500.
    Sanzari M; De Toni S; D'Osualdo A; Rossetti M; Floriani F; Plebani M
    Panminerva Med; 1998 Jun; 40(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 9689832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of electronic cell counts by quantitative buffy coat analysis (QBC).
    Polack B; Pernod G; Mossuz P; Vigier JP; Giraud S; Kolodié L
    Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1995; 37(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 7567433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.