234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33231690)
1. Utility of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning of Total Hip Arthroplasty Components Using a Posterior and Direct Anterior Approach.
Belyea CM; Lansford JL; Yim DG
Mil Med; 2022 Jan; 187(1-2):e11-e16. PubMed ID: 33231690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?
Rathod PA; Bhalla S; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1877-85. PubMed ID: 24549773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Bingham JS; Spangehl MJ; Hines JT; Taunton MJ; Schwartz AJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2927-2931. PubMed ID: 29853308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?
Kamara E; Robinson J; Bas MA; Rodriguez JA; Hepinstall MS
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):125-130. PubMed ID: 27499519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does intraoperative fluoroscopy improve acetabular component positioning and limb-length discrepancy during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.
Sun C; Lee WG; Ma Q; Zhang X; Zhao Z; Cai X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Aug; 18(1):586. PubMed ID: 37553600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluoroscopy assessment during anterior minimally invasive hip replacement is more accurate than with the posterior approach.
Ji W; Stewart N
Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25957590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study.
Tripuraneni KR; Munson NR; Archibeck MJ; Carothers JT
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2299-302. PubMed ID: 27067169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting?
Delagrammaticas DE; Ochenjele G; Rosenthal BD; Assenmacher B; Manning DW; Stover MD
Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31387397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on acetabular component positioning and patient anatomy restoration during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Sun C; Lee WG; Ma Q; Zhang X; Song F; Cai X
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Apr; 144(4):1781-1792. PubMed ID: 38147077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Between the Posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy.
Lin TJ; Bendich I; Ha AS; Keeney BJ; Moschetti WE; Tomek IM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):616-623. PubMed ID: 27612607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Optimize Limb Length and the Precision of Acetabular Positioning in Primary THA?
Leucht P; Huddleston HG; Bellino MJ; Huddleston JI
Orthopedics; 2015 May; 38(5):e380-6. PubMed ID: 25970364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.
Domb BG; El Bitar YF; Sadik AY; Stake CE; Botser IB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):329-36. PubMed ID: 23990446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluoroscopy-guided direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty provides more accurate component positions in the supine position than in the lateral position.
Chen P; Liu W; Wu C; Ruan P; Zeng J; Ji W
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Nov; 24(1):884. PubMed ID: 37957622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Obesity on Fluoroscopy-Assisted Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Davidovitch R; Riesgo A; Bolz N; Murphy H; Anoushiravani A; Snir N
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2020 Sep; 78(3):187-194. PubMed ID: 32857026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Component Positioning Between Fluoroscopy-Assisted and Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Stewart NJ; Stewart JL; Brisbin A
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1602-1605.e3. PubMed ID: 35314287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does fluoroscopy improve acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty?
Beamer BS; Morgan JH; Barr C; Weaver MJ; Vrahas MS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 472(12):3953-62. PubMed ID: 25238804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of operative approach and intraoperative imaging on leg length discrepancy and acetabular component angle in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.
Thompson Z; Khoshbin A; Ward S; Brillantes J; Melo L; Waddell JP; Atrey A
Int Orthop; 2024 Feb; 48(2):473-479. PubMed ID: 37715062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position Using a Novel Method to Determine Anteversion.
Boettner F; Zingg M; Emara AK; Waldstein W; Faschingbauer M; Kasparek MF
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 27839959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
