331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33232695)
1. Combined virtual reality and haptic robotics induce space and movement invariant sensorimotor adaptation.
Wilf M; Cerra Cheraka M; Jeanneret M; Ott R; Perrin H; Crottaz-Herbette S; Serino A
Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jan; 150():107692. PubMed ID: 33232695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptation and spatial generalization to a triaxial visuomotor perturbation in a virtual reality environment.
Lefrançois C; Messier J
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 237(3):793-803. PubMed ID: 30607472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Movement kinematic and postural control differences when performing a visuomotor skill in real and virtual environments.
Brock K; Vine SJ; Ross JM; Trevarthen M; Harris DJ
Exp Brain Res; 2023 Jul; 241(7):1797-1810. PubMed ID: 37222777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bottom-up transfer of sensory-motor plasticity to recovery of spatial cognition: visuomotor adaptation and spatial neglect.
Rode G; Pisella L; Rossetti Y; Farnè A; Boisson D
Prog Brain Res; 2003; 142():273-87. PubMed ID: 12693267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An immersive virtual reality system for ecological assessment of peripersonal and extrapersonal unilateral spatial neglect.
Perez-Marcos D; Ronchi R; Giroux A; Brenet F; Serino A; Tadi T; Blanke O
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Mar; 20(1):33. PubMed ID: 36934277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reaching to sounds in virtual reality: A multisensory-motor approach to promote adaptation to altered auditory cues.
Valzolgher C; Verdelet G; Salemme R; Lombardi L; Gaveau V; Farné A; Pavani F
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Dec; 149():107665. PubMed ID: 33130161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.
Viau A; Feldman AG; McFadyen BJ; Levin MF
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 1(1):11. PubMed ID: 15679937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual reality applications for the remapping of space in neglect patients.
Ansuini C; Pierno AC; Lusher D; Castiello U
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2006; 24(4-6):431-41. PubMed ID: 17119316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification and Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Validation Study in Healthy Subjects.
Faity G; Sidahmed Y; Laffont I; Froger J
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 37050541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in immersive haptic-free virtual reality.
Mangalam M; Yarossi M; Furmanek MP; Tunik E
Exp Brain Res; 2021 May; 239(5):1651-1665. PubMed ID: 33774688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards functional robotic training: motor learning of dynamic tasks is enhanced by haptic rendering but hampered by arm weight support.
Özen Ö; Buetler KA; Marchal-Crespo L
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 35152897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual Reality Environments and Haptic Strategies to Enhance Implicit Learning and Motivation in Robot-Assisted Training.
Bernardoni F; Ozen O; Buetler K; Marchal-Crespo L
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():760-765. PubMed ID: 31374722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
Berberovic N; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(4):493-503. PubMed ID: 12559165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality.
Castiello U; Lusher D; Burton C; Glover S; Disler P
Neurology; 2004 Jun; 62(11):1958-62. PubMed ID: 15184596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visuomotor misalignment induced through immersive virtual reality to improve spatial neglect: a case-series study.
Chen P; Boukrina O; Krch D
Neurocase; 2022 Aug; 28(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 36219753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opposing force fields induce direction-specific sensorimotor adaptation but a non-specific perceptual shift consistent with a contraction of peripersonal space representation.
Leclere NX; Sarlegna FR; Coello Y; Bourdin C
Exp Brain Res; 2021 Jan; 239(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 33097985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility and relevance of an immersive virtual reality cancellation task assessing far space in unilateral spatial neglect.
Guilbert A; Bara TG; Bouchara T; Gaffard M; Bourlon C
J Neuropsychol; 2024 Jun; 18(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 37942647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of an immersive virtual reality system for training near and far space neglect in individuals with stroke: a pilot study.
Yasuda K; Muroi D; Ohira M; Iwata H
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 24(7):533-538. PubMed ID: 28701101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hiding Assistive Robots During Training in Immersive VR Does Not Affect Users' Motivation, Presence, Embodiment, Performance, Nor Visual Attention.
Wenk N; Jordi MV; Buetler KA; Marchal-Crespo L
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():390-399. PubMed ID: 35085087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visuomotor adaptation in head-mounted virtual reality versus conventional training.
Anglin JM; Sugiyama T; Liew SL
Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():45469. PubMed ID: 28374808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]