166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33233725)
1. Analyzing Land-Use Change Scenarios for Ecosystem Services and their Trade-Offs in the Ecological Conservation Area in Beijing, China.
Li Z; Cheng X; Han H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33233725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trade-Off and Projecting Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services under Different Policies Scenarios: A Case Study in Central China.
Ji Z; Wei H; Xue D; Liu M; Cai E; Chen W; Feng X; Li J; Lu J; Guo Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33805548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ecosystem services in conservation planning: Assessing compatible vs. incompatible conservation.
Fang C; Cai Z; Devlin AT; Yan X; Chen H; Zeng X; Xia Y; Zhang Q
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jun; 312():114906. PubMed ID: 35390611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response and multiscenario simulation of trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services to the Grain to Green Program: a case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, China.
Chen T; Peng L; Wang Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(22):33572-33586. PubMed ID: 35029821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Land Cover Implications on Ecosystem Service Delivery: a Multi-Scenario Study of Trade-offs and Synergies in River Basins.
Padilha J; Carvalho-Santos C; Cássio F; Pascoal C
Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 73(4):753-768. PubMed ID: 38063877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial-Temporal Variations and Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province, China.
Yang Q; Zhang P; Qiu X; Xu G; Chi J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36613177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service synergy and trade-off in Qinling Mountains, China].
Wang X; Mu Q; Luo MY; Zhao YH; Yang SY; Zhang L; Qu Z
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 33(8):2057-2067. PubMed ID: 36043811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.
Hu Y; Peng J; Liu Y; Tian L
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():849-860. PubMed ID: 29306828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services at Watershed and Landscape Scales: A Case Analysis of the Yellow River Basin (Henan Section).
Niu H; Liu M; Xiao D; Zhao X; An R; Fan L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem services in the Aral Sea basin under different CMIP6 projections.
He J; Yu Y; Sun L; Li C; Zhang H; Malik I; Wistuba M; Yu R
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12237. PubMed ID: 38806537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating spatiotemporal dynamics and trade-off/synergy of multiple ecosystem services in response to land cover change: a case study of Nanjing city, China.
Zhao J; Li C
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Oct; 192(11):701. PubMed ID: 33051711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ecosystem service trade-offs and spatial non-stationary responses to influencing factors in the Loess hilly-gully region: Lanzhou City, China.
Zhao T; Pan J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 846():157422. PubMed ID: 35850359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trade-off among grain production, animal husbandry production, and habitat quality based on future scenario simulations in Xilinhot.
Wang H; Hu Y; Yan H; Liang Y; Guo X; Ye J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 817():153015. PubMed ID: 35026260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Scenario simulation of ecosystem service trade-offs in bay cities: A case study in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China].
DU Y; Shui W; Sun XR; Yang HF; Zheng JY
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Dec; 30(12):4293-4302. PubMed ID: 31840476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-Scenario Analysis of Habitat Quality in the Yellow River Delta by Coupling FLUS with InVEST Model.
Ding Q; Chen Y; Bu L; Ye Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33804509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolutionary patterns and influencing factors of relationships among ecosystem services in the hilly red soil region of Southern China.
Liao Q; Li T; Liu D
Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Mar; 196(4):360. PubMed ID: 38472494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact and trade off analysis of land use change on spatial pattern of ecosystem services in Chishui River Basin.
Luo R; Yang S; Wang Z; Zhang T; Gao P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20234-20248. PubMed ID: 34729715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China.
Sun X; Yang P; Tao Y; Bian H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149849. PubMed ID: 34455273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China.
Sun X; Li F
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1569-1581. PubMed ID: 28810509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China.
Wang LJ; Ma S; Qiao YP; Zhang JC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33114783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
