188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33234316)
1. Does implant surface hydrophilicity influence the maintenance of surface integrity after insertion into low-density artificial bone?
Silva GAF; Faot F; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA
Dent Mater; 2021 Feb; 37(2):e69-e84. PubMed ID: 33234316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone.
Silva GAF; Faot F; Possebon APDR; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104515. PubMed ID: 33932754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrity of implant surface modifications after insertion.
Mints D; Elias C; Funkenbusch P; Meirelles L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 24451859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study.
Velasco-Ortega E; Ortiz-García I; Jiménez-Guerra A; Monsalve-Guil L; Muñoz-Guzón F; Perez RA; Gil FJ
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 31277204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Rough Surfaces: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in an Adult Minipig Model.
Fabbro MD; Taschieri S; Canciani E; Addis A; Musto F; Weinstein R; Dellavia C
Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 28234707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants.
Sartoretto SC; Alves AT; Resende RF; Calasans-Maia J; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia MD
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 26221922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydrophilic surface of Ti6Al4V-ELI alloy improves the early bone apposition of sheep tibia.
Sartoretto SC; Alves ATNN; Zarranz L; Jorge MZ; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia MD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Aug; 28(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 27317626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Different Microstructured Surfaces on the Osseointegration of CAD/CAM Zirconia Dental Implants: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.
Ding Q; Zhang R; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1113-1121. PubMed ID: 33270051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing osseointegration of titanium implants through large-grit sandblasting combined with micro-arc oxidation surface modification.
He W; Yin X; Xie L; Liu Z; Li J; Zou S; Chen J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Jun; 30(6):73. PubMed ID: 31187259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental implant surfaces after insertion in bone: an in vitro study in four commercial implant systems.
Deppe H; Wolff C; Bauer F; Ruthenberg R; Sculean A; Mücke T
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29067521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of peri-implant bone tissue between hydrophilic and rough implant surfaces in spontaneously hypertensive rats treated with losartan.
Santos JSD; Mulinari-Santos G; DE Souza Batista FR; Gomes-Ferreira PHS; Palin LP; Antoniali C; Okamoto R
J Appl Oral Sci; 2024; 32():e20230374. PubMed ID: 38922240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histomorphometric analysis of implant osseointegration using hydrophilic implants in diabetic rats.
Schuster AJ; de Abreu JLB; Pola NM; Witek L; Coelho PG; Faot F
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Oct; 25(10):5867-5878. PubMed ID: 33765194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs.
Ou KL; Hsu HJ; Yang TS; Lin YH; Chen CS; Peng PW
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 26507647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early-stage osseointegration capability of a submicrofeatured titanium surface created by microroughening and anodic oxidation.
Yamada M; Ueno T; Minamikawa H; Ikeda T; Nakagawa K; Ogawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep; 24(9):991-1001. PubMed ID: 22726210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early Osseointegration Events on Neoss® ProActive and Bimodal Implants: A Comparison of Different Surfaces in an Animal Model.
Grossi-Oliveira GA; Antunes AA; Elias CN; Wennerberg A; Sennerby L; Salata LA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1060-72. PubMed ID: 26780622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
