BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33234539)

  • 1. A Literature Analysis of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge.
    Danzer GS; Wasser TD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Mar; 49(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 33234539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
    Gottfried ED; Hudson BL; Vitacco MJ; Carbonell JL
    Assessment; 2017 Mar; 24(2):232-243. PubMed ID: 26423350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Convergent validity of a screening measure designed to identify defendants feigning knowledge deficits related to competence to stand trial.
    Otto RK; Musick JE; Sherrod C
    Assessment; 2011 Mar; 18(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20634419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying persons feigning limitations in their competence to proceed in the legal process.
    Guenther CC; Otto RK
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 20842642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feigned Adjudicative Incompetence.
    Rogers R; Robinson EV; Henry SA
    Assessment; 2017 Mar; 24(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 26384736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How good are inpatients at feigning Miranda abilities?: An investigation of the Miranda Quiz, Inventory of Legal Knowledge, and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology.
    Rogers R; Otal TK; Velsor SF; Pan M
    Behav Sci Law; 2021 Jun; 39(3):245-261. PubMed ID: 33851430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations.
    Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations.
    Soliman S; Resnick PJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):614-29. PubMed ID: 20687120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment.
    Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B
    Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.
    Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT
    Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a measure for assessing malingered incompetency in criminal proceedings: Denney competency related test (D-CRT).
    Denney RL; Thinda S; Finn PM; Fazio RL; Chen MJ; Walsh MR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Mar; 46(2):124-140. PubMed ID: 38346168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J
    Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J; Munizza J
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17058121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
    Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW; Grandjean NR; Vitacco MJ
    Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 12056080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of the ECST-R as a screen for feigned incompetency to stand trial.
    Rogers R; Jackson RL; Sewell KW; Harrison KS
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Jun; 16(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 15222810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and Validation of the False Disorder Score: The Focal Scale of the Inventory of Problems.
    Viglione DJ; Giromini L; Landis P; McCullaugh JM; Pizitz TD; O'Brien S; Wood S; Connell K; Abramsky A
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(6):653-661. PubMed ID: 30388903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-validation of the PAI Negative Distortion Scale for feigned mental disorders: a research report.
    Rogers R; Gillard ND; Wooley CN; Kelsey KR
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22855508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of feigned mental retardation using the new generation of malingering detection instruments: preliminary findings.
    Graue LO; Berry DT; Clark JA; Sollman MJ; Cardi M; Hopkins J; Werline D
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 17886151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations.
    Drob SL; Meehan KB; Waxman SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 19297641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.