204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33234950)
1. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Faulkner HR; Shikowitz-Behr L; McLeod M; Wright E; Hulsen J; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):731e-736e. PubMed ID: 33234950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Associated Contracture: A Clinical and Histologic Analysis of Patients Undergoing Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.
Kearney AM; Yan Y; Bricker JT; Pincus JL; Alghoul MS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):968-977. PubMed ID: 34495907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Review of Outcomes in Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction with and without Surgical Mesh Assistance.
DeLong MR; Tandon VJ; Bertrand AA; MacEachern M; Goldberg M; Salibian A; Pusic AL; Festekjian JH; Wilkins EG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 33177453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postirradiation Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Management and Outcome.
Haran O; Bracha G; Tiosano A; Menes T; Madah E; Gur E; Barnea Y; Arad E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 147(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 33002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From Salvage to Prevention: A Single-Surgeon Experience with Acellular Dermal Matrix and Infection in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Powers JM; Reuter Muñoz KD; Parkerson J; Nigro LC; Blanchet NP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Dec; 148(6):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 34644266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bostwick Autoderm and Implant Technique: Improved Outcomes for Obese Patients in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Danker S; Schmitt M; Smith N; Chong HJ; Sandholm PH; Murphy JA; Ladizinsky DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):187e-195e. PubMed ID: 33165289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients.
Safran T; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):686e-696e. PubMed ID: 32221195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acellular dermal matrix in irradiated tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction: evidence-based review.
Clemens MW; Kronowitz SJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):27S-34S. PubMed ID: 23096982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Urban C; González E; Fornazari A; Berman G; Spautz C; Kuroda F; Furlan Anselmi K; Rabinovich I; Dória M; Nissen L; Schünemann E; Sobreiro B; Lima R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov; 150(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 35994351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Examining the Role of Acellular Dermal Matrix Fenestrations.
Mowlds DS; Salibian AA; Scholz T; Paydar KZ; Wirth GA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Oct; 136(4):629-635. PubMed ID: 26090760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience.
Salzberg CA; Ashikari AY; Berry C; Hunsicker LM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 138(2):329-337. PubMed ID: 27064232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.
Haddock NT; Kadakia Y; Liu Y; Teotia SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34003807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibition Mechanism of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Capsule Formation in Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.
Kim IK; Park SO; Chang H; Jin US
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):2279-2287. PubMed ID: 29855829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients.
Haynes DF; Kreithen JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Nov; 134(5):892-899. PubMed ID: 25347625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Salibian AH; Harness JK; Mowlds DS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 28027223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
Tessler O; Reish RG; Maman DY; Smith BL; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):90e-99e. PubMed ID: 24469217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
Heine N; Hoesl V; Seitz S; Prantl L; Brebant V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 305(4):937-943. PubMed ID: 34554314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Reported Outcomes after Irradiation of Tissue Expander versus Permanent Implant in Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Yoon AP; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Jagsi R; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG; Kozlow JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):917e-926e. PubMed ID: 32332528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
