These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33236761)

  • 1. Evaluation of consensus strategies for haplotype phasing.
    Al Bkhetan Z; Chana G; Ramamohanarao K; Verspoor K; Goudey B
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33236761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EagleImp: fast and accurate genome-wide phasing and imputation in a single tool.
    Wienbrandt L; Ellinghaus D
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 38(22):4999-5006. PubMed ID: 36130053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring effective approaches for haplotype block phasing.
    Al Bkhetan Z; Zobel J; Kowalczyk A; Verspoor K; Goudey B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):540. PubMed ID: 31666002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating read-based and population-based phasing for dense and accurate haplotyping of individual genomes.
    Bansal V
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(14):i242-i248. PubMed ID: 31510646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of phasing strategies for whole human genomes.
    Choi Y; Chan AP; Kirkness E; Telenti A; Schork NJ
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Apr; 14(4):e1007308. PubMed ID: 29621242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DCHap: A Divide-and-Conquer Haplotype Phasing Algorithm for Third-Generation Sequences.
    Li Y; Lin Y
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(3):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 32750878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels.
    Faux P; Druet T
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):46. PubMed ID: 28511677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. eQTLHap: a tool for comprehensive eQTL analysis considering haplotypic and genotypic effects.
    Al Bkhetan Z; Chana G; Soon Ong C; Goudey B; Ramamohanarao K
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33834181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Off the street phasing (OTSP): no hassle haplotype phasing for molecular PGD applications.
    Zeevi DA; Zahdeh F; Kling Y; Carmi S; Altarescu G
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Apr; 36(4):727-739. PubMed ID: 30617673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; Wilson JF; Dunstan N; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):12. PubMed ID: 21388557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dynamic Bayesian Markov model for phasing and characterizing haplotypes in next-generation sequencing.
    Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(7):878-85. PubMed ID: 23407359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint haplotype phasing and genotype calling of multiple individuals using haplotype informative reads.
    Zhang K; Zhi D
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct; 29(19):2427-34. PubMed ID: 23943637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-resolution population-specific recombination rates and their effect on phasing and genotype imputation.
    Hassan S; Surakka I; Taskinen MR; Salomaa V; Palotie A; Wessman M; Tukiainen T; Pirinen M; Palta P; Ripatti S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 Apr; 29(4):615-624. PubMed ID: 33249422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of different algorithms for phasing haplotypes using Holstein cattle genotypes and pedigree data.
    Miar Y; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2837-2849. PubMed ID: 28161175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phasing for medical sequencing using rare variants and large haplotype reference panels.
    Sharp K; Kretzschmar W; Delaneau O; Marchini J
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(13):1974-80. PubMed ID: 27153703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarking phasing software with a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.
    Oget-Ebrad C; Kadri NK; Moreira GCM; Karim L; Coppieters W; Georges M; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):130. PubMed ID: 35164677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PhaseME: Automatic rapid assessment of phasing quality and phasing improvement.
    Majidian S; Sedlazeck FJ
    Gigascience; 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32706368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A fast data-driven method for genotype imputation, phasing and local ancestry inference: MendelImpute.jl.
    Chu BB; Sobel EM; Wasiolek R; Ko S; Sinsheimer JS; Zhou H; Lange K
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 37(24):4756-4763. PubMed ID: 34289008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel.
    Loh PR; Danecek P; Palamara PF; Fuchsberger C; A Reshef Y; K Finucane H; Schoenherr S; Forer L; McCarthy S; Abecasis GR; Durbin R; L Price A
    Nat Genet; 2016 Nov; 48(11):1443-1448. PubMed ID: 27694958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative analysis of current phasing and imputation software.
    De Marino A; Mahmoud AA; Bose M; Bircan KO; Terpolovsky A; Bamunusinghe V; Bohn S; Khan U; Novković B; Yazdi PG
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0260177. PubMed ID: 36260643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.