These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33236808)

  • 1. How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes.
    Muscatello A; Elith J; Kujala H
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1309-1320. PubMed ID: 33236808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving effectiveness of systematic conservation planning with density data.
    Veloz S; Salas L; Altman B; Alexander J; Jongsomjit D; Elliott N; Ballard G
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 25873240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
    Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use.
    Robillard CM; Kerr JT
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):837-847. PubMed ID: 27991681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conservation planning on China's borders with Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam.
    Wang L; Yang B; Bai Y; Lu X; Corlett RT; Tan Y; Chen XY; Zhu J; Liu Y; Quan RC
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1797-1808. PubMed ID: 33749881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
    Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Building robust conservation plans.
    Visconti P; Joppa L
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating intraseasonal grassland dynamics in cross-scale distribution modeling to support waterbird recovery plans.
    Regos A; Vidal M; Lorenzo M; Domínguez J
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 31461173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
    Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change.
    Albert CH; Rayfield B; Dumitru M; Gonzalez A
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1383-1396. PubMed ID: 28383758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving inferences about private land conservation by accounting for incomplete reporting.
    Williamson MA; Dickson BG; Hooten MB; Graves RA; Lubell MN; Schwartz MW
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 33319392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representation of critical natural capital in China.
    Lü Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Fu B; Whitham C; Liu S; Wu B
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 28218967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Software for prioritizing conservation actions based on probabilistic information.
    Watts M; Klein CJ; Tulloch VJD; Carvalho SB; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1299-1308. PubMed ID: 33305882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microtargeting for conservation.
    Metcalf AL; Phelan CN; Pallai C; Norton M; Yuhas B; Finley JC; Muth A
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 30887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial conservation prioritisation in data-poor countries: a quantitative sensitivity analysis using multiple taxa.
    El-Gabbas A; Gilbert F; Dormann CF
    BMC Ecol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 32590973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning.
    Lechner AM; Raymond CM; Adams VM; Polyakov M; Gordon A; Rhodes JR; Mills M; Stein A; Ives CD; Lefroy EC
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1497-511. PubMed ID: 25382071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of protected areas to avian persistence across 20 years of climate and land-use change.
    Peach MA; Cohen JB; Frair JL; Zuckerberg B; Sullivan P; Porter WF; Lang C
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):423-433. PubMed ID: 30113109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of climate and land-cover change on the conservation status of gibbons.
    Yang L; Chen T; Shi KC; Zhang L; Lwin N; Fan PF
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Feb; 37(1):e14045. PubMed ID: 36511895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of demand for and spatial flow of ecosystem services to identify priority areas.
    Verhagen W; Kukkala AS; Moilanen A; van Teeffelen AJA; Verburg PH
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):860-871. PubMed ID: 27943463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.