These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33236825)

  • 1. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
    Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Chang SH; Huang KG; Yang LY; Pan YB; Lai CH; Chou HH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Sep; 35(5):e60. PubMed ID: 38425140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 （LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
    Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic Factors and Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
    Kim JH; Shim SH; Nam SH; Lee SW; Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 32084588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.
    Kim SI; Choi BR; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34969535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Upfront laparotomy versus conversion from minimally invasive surgery to open surgery in colon cancer: Is there a difference in outcomes?
    Horesh N; Emile SH; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Zhou P; Wexner SD
    Surgery; 2024 Jul; 176(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 38641543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
    Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003).
    Kong TW; Kim J; Son JH; Lee AJ; Yang EJ; Shim SH; Kim NK; Kim Y; Suh DH; Hwang DW; Park SJ; Kim HS; Lee YY; Yoo JG; Lee SJ; Chang SJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 176():122-129. PubMed ID: 37515926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Da Vinci robotic surgery system in cervical cancer: A single institution experience of 557 cases.
    Li J; Gong X; Li P; Xiao L; Chang X; Ouyang X; Tang J
    Asian J Surg; 2022 Feb; 45(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34373166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally Invasive Staging Surgery in Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
    Bregar AJ; Melamed A; Diver E; Clemmer JT; Uppal S; Schorge JO; Rice LW; Del Carmen MG; Rauh-Hain JA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):1677-1687. PubMed ID: 28074326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.