These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Errors and dangers in intestinal sutures and anastomoses using stapler suture instruments (EEA, TA55, TA90, GIA)]. Gögler E Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1985; 366():467-75. PubMed ID: 3903401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Manual suture versus/or mechanical suture from the German viewpoint]. Thiede A; Hamelmann H Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():105-12. PubMed ID: 3323718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Use of surgical staplers on the upper gastrointestinal tract]. Engemann R; Lünstedt B; Fuchs KH; Thiede A Zentralbl Chir; 1993; 118(8):440-5. PubMed ID: 8379262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Manual suture versus/or mechanical suture from the Austrian viewpoint]. Kronberger L; Germann R Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():89-91. PubMed ID: 3323741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Using a surgical stapler on the gastrointestinal tract--pro and contra]. Hölscher AH; Siewert JR Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1992; 377(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 1569805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Technic of rectum anastomoses in rectum resection. A controlled study: instrumental suture versus hand suture]. Thiede A; Schubert G; Poser HL; Jostarndt L Chirurg; 1984 May; 55(5):326-35. PubMed ID: 6375991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Stapler versus manual anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery]. Moreno-Gonzalez E; Vara-Thorbeck R Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():99-103. PubMed ID: 3323743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Manual suture versus/or mechanical suture (from the Italian viewpoint)]. Fegiz G Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():93-7. PubMed ID: 3323742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract by means of suture staplers]. Salvesen S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1987 Apr; 107(10-11):933-4, 932. PubMed ID: 3299857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Performance of mechanical suture in surgery of digestive tract by means of a stapler]. Androsow PI Pol Przegl Chir; 1968; 40(10):1101-13. PubMed ID: 4882643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is it worth using mechanical sutures in gastric surgery? Valdivieso A; Sarabia S; Pocino R; Onandia JR; Tobalina E; Ventoso A; Hernandez MJ Acta Chir Belg; 1995; 95(4 Suppl):179-81. PubMed ID: 8779294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Enteral anastomoses in the area of the upper gastrointestinal tract with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring]. Vogel S; Engemann R; Thiede A Zentralbl Chir; 1993; 118(8):452-8. PubMed ID: 8397464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Results of a French survey on the use of surgical staplers in gastrointestinal surgery]. Hollender LF; Bahnini J Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():85-7. PubMed ID: 3431308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Indications and value of mechanical anastomoses of the upper gastrointestinal tract]. Günther B; Koller J Chirurg; 1985 Apr; 56(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 3888549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [New technical and methodologic developments in surgery: mechanical suture technique]. Ulrich B Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir; 1989; ():359-63. PubMed ID: 2577567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]