These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33238476)

  • 1. Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Vinhas AS; Aroso C; Salazar F; López-Jarana P; Ríos-Santos JV; Herrero-Climent M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33238476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage at the Different Implant Abutment Interface: A Systematic Review.
    Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Kumari S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZE10-ZE15. PubMed ID: 28764310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.
    Vinhas AS; Aroso C; Salazar F; Relvas M; Braga AC; Ríos-Carrasco B; Gil J; Rios-Santos JV; Fernández-Palacín A; Herrero-Climent M
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Feb; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 35207933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Assessment of Preload Maintenance in the Abutment Screws of Single Posterior Implants After 1 Month of Use.
    Xu Y; Li W; Su M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):177-181. PubMed ID: 33600539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.
    Rodrigues EDS; Benetti P; Carli JP; Paranhos LR; Santos PL; Linden MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1306-1311. PubMed ID: 30602632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Relationship Between Time of Retightening and Preload Loss of Abutment Screws for Two Different Implant Designs: An In Vitro Study.
    Varvara G; Sinjari B; Caputi S; Scarano A; Piattelli M
    J Oral Implantol; 2020 Feb; 46(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 31580759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss of preload in screwed implant joints as a function of time and tightening/untightening sequences.
    Bernardes SR; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M; Hobkirk J; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 24451858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The mechanical and clinical influences of prosthetic index structure in Morse taper implant-abutment connection: a scoping review.
    Shen L; Dong C; Chen J; Bai X; Yang F; Wang L
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):775. PubMed ID: 37865734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical comparison of experimental conical-head abutment screws with conventional flat-head abutment screws for external-hex and internal tri-channel implant connections: an in vitro evaluation of loosening torque.
    Coppedê AR; Faria AC; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Shibli JA; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):e321-9. PubMed ID: 24278937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Morse Cone Connection with the Internal Hexagon and External Hexagon Connections Based on Microleakage - Review.
    Bittencourt ABBC; Neto CLMM; Penitente PA; Pellizzer EP; Dos Santos DM; Goiato MC
    Prague Med Rep; 2021; 122(3):181-190. PubMed ID: 34606430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of double conical abutment screw on implant preload.
    Arnetzl GV; Payer M; Falkensammer F; Arnetzl G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 26249208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of implant abutment connection designs, and implant diameters on screw loosening before and after cyclic loading: In-vitro study.
    Sammour SR; Maamoun El-Sheikh M; Aly El-Gendy A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):e265-e271. PubMed ID: 31427043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurements of Repeated Tightening and Loosening Torque of Seven Different Implant/Abutment Connection Designs and Their Modifications: An In Vitro Study.
    Butkevica A; Nathanson D; Pober R; Strating H
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):153-161. PubMed ID: 27003231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Implant Connection, Abutment Design and Screw Insertion Torque on Implant-Abutment Misfit.
    Vélez J; Peláez J; López-Suárez C; Agustín-Panadero R; Tobar C; Suárez MJ
    J Clin Med; 2020 Jul; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 32722131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Screw Configuration on the Preload Force of Implant-Abutment Screws.
    Zipprich H; Rathe F; Pinz S; Schlotmann L; Lauer HC; Ratka C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):e25-e32. PubMed ID: 29534122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of Sealing Gel on Vertical Misfit at the Implant-Abutment Interface and Preload Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Seloto CB; Strazzi-Sahyon HB; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 32406643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preload loss of abutment screws after dynamic fatigue in single implant-supported restorations. A systematic review.
    Pardal-Peláez B; Montero J
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Nov; 9(11):e1355-e1361. PubMed ID: 29302289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of sealing gel on the microleakage resistance and mechanical behavior during dynamic loading of 3 implant systems.
    Yu P; Zhi Li ; Tan X; Yu H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 33246561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic analysis of factors that cause loss of preload in dental implants.
    Nithyapriya S; Ramesh AS; Kirubakaran A; Mani J; Raghunathan J
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(3):189-195. PubMed ID: 30111906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Abutment Screw Design and Crown/Implant Ratio on Preload Maintenance of Single-Crown Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Rodrigues I; Zanardi P; Sesma N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 31711081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.