These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging. Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of training with the american college of radiology breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon on mammographic interpretation skills in developing countries. Lehman CD; Miller L; Rutter CM; Tsu V Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 11450966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period]. Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer. Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. Baum JK; Hanna LG; Acharyya S; Mahoney MC; Conant EF; Bassett LW; Pisano ED Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21502382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database. Elezaby M; Li G; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Burnside ES; DeMartini WB Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):416-422. PubMed ID: 29315061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts. Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) or French "classification ACR" What tool for what use? A point of view. Dilhuydy MH Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 17184950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Frankel SD; Ominsky SH; Sickles EA; Ernster V J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1801-9. PubMed ID: 9839520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices. Lee CI; Ichikawa L; Rochelle MC; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Sprague BL; DeMartini WB; Wernli KJ; Joe BN; Yankaskas BC; Lehman CD Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1370-6. PubMed ID: 25126973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study. Duffy SW; Dibden A; Michalopoulos D; Offman J; Parmar D; Jenkins J; Collins B; Robson T; Scorfield S; Green K; Hall C; Liao XH; Ryan M; Johnson F; Stevens G; Kearins O; Sellars S; Patnick J Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 26655422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Durand MA; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Copit DS; Barke LD; Rose SL; Hayes MK; Greer LN; Dabbous FM; Conant EF Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 33258744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Criteria for identifying radiologists with acceptable screening mammography interpretive performance on basis of multiple performance measures. Miglioretti DL; Ichikawa L; Smith RA; Bassett LW; Feig SA; Monsees B; Parikh JR; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Carney PA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):W486-91. PubMed ID: 25794100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study. Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]