These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33241276)

  • 41. Role of analytical testing for food fraud risk mitigation - A commentary on implementation of analytical fraud testing: Role of analytical testing for food fraud mitigation.
    Butler F; Luijckx NL; Marvin HJP; Bouzembrak Y; Mojtahed V
    Curr Res Food Sci; 2021; 4():301-307. PubMed ID: 33997797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Chemometric tools for food fraud detection: The role of target class in non-targeted analysis.
    Rodionova OY; Pomerantsev AL
    Food Chem; 2020 Jul; 317():126448. PubMed ID: 32114274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fraud in Animal Origin Food Products: Advances in Emerging Spectroscopic Detection Methods over the Past Five Years.
    Hassoun A; Måge I; Schmidt WF; Temiz HT; Li L; Kim HY; Nilsen H; Biancolillo A; Aït-Kaddour A; Sikorski M; Sikorska E; Grassi S; Cozzolino D
    Foods; 2020 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 32781687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Modern analytical methods for the detection of food fraud and adulteration by food category.
    Hong E; Lee SY; Jeong JY; Park JM; Kim BH; Kwon K; Chun HS
    J Sci Food Agric; 2017 Sep; 97(12):3877-3896. PubMed ID: 28397254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Photoacoustic Laser System for Food Fraud Detection.
    Fiorani L; Artuso F; Giardina I; Lai A; Mannori S; Puiu A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34207037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Meat Vulnerabilities to Economic Food Adulteration Require New Analytical Solutions.
    Cavin C; Cottenet G; Cooper KM; Zbinden P
    Chimia (Aarau); 2018 Oct; 72(10):697-703. PubMed ID: 30376918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Food Fraud Prevention: Policy, Strategy, and Decision-Making - Implementation Steps for a Government Agency or Industry.
    Spink J; Fortin ND; Moyer DC; Miao H; Wu Y
    Chimia (Aarau); 2016; 70(5):320-8. PubMed ID: 27198808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Recent food safety and fraud issues within the dairy supply chain (2015-2019).
    Montgomery H; Haughey SA; Elliott CT
    Glob Food Sec; 2020 Sep; 26():100447. PubMed ID: 33083214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Three centuries on the science of coffee authenticity control.
    Ferreira T; Galluzzi L; de Paulis T; Farah A
    Food Res Int; 2021 Nov; 149():110690. PubMed ID: 34600685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Food Safety, Food Fraud, and Food Defense: A Fast Evolving Literature.
    Manning L; Soon JM
    J Food Sci; 2016 Apr; 81(4):R823-34. PubMed ID: 26934423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Health care fraud control: understanding the challenge.
    Sparrow MK
    J Insur Med; 1996; 28(2):86-96. PubMed ID: 10163950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Consumer Knowledge about Food Labeling and Fraud.
    Moreira MJ; García-Díez J; de Almeida JMMM; Saraiva C
    Foods; 2021 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 34063359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Developing anti-counterfeiting measures: The role of smart packaging.
    Soon JM; Manning L
    Food Res Int; 2019 Sep; 123():135-143. PubMed ID: 31284961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Feeding fiction: Fraud vulnerability in the food service industry.
    van Ruth SM; van der Veeken J; Dekker P; Luning PA; Huisman W
    Food Res Int; 2020 Jul; 133():109158. PubMed ID: 32466937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. State-of-the-Art of Analytical Techniques to Determine Food Fraud in Olive Oils.
    Pereira AG; Otero P; Fraga-Corral M; Garcia-Oliveira P; Carpena M; Prieto MA; Simal-Gandara J
    Foods; 2021 Feb; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 33668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. FADB-China: A molecular-level food adulteration database in China based on molecular fingerprints and similarity algorithms prediction expansion.
    Zhang D; Ouyang S; Cai M; Zhang H; Ding S; Liu D; Cai P; Le Y; Hu QN
    Food Chem; 2020 Oct; 327():127010. PubMed ID: 32442849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development of a comprehensive analytical platform for the detection and quantitation of food fraud using a biomarker approach. The oregano adulteration case study.
    Wielogorska E; Chevallier O; Black C; Galvin-King P; Delêtre M; Kelleher CT; Haughey SA; Elliott CT
    Food Chem; 2018 Jan; 239():32-39. PubMed ID: 28873575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Food Fingerprinting: Using a Two-Tiered approach to Monitor and Mitigate Food Fraud in Rice.
    McGrath TF; Shannon M; Chevallier OP; Ch R; Xu F; Kong F; Peng H; Teye E; Akaba S; Wu D; Wu L; Cai Q; Le Nguyen DD; Le VVM; Pandor S; Kapil AP; Zhang G; McBride M; Elliott CT
    J AOAC Int; 2021 Mar; 104(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 33439979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Which Company Characteristics Make a Food Business at Risk for Food Fraud?
    van Ruth SM; Nillesen O
    Foods; 2021 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33924386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).
    Hafner J
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.