These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33241427)

  • 1. A validated prediction score for having two or more embryos for cryopreservation following freeze-all IVF cycles: an analysis utilizing SART CORS database.
    Ibrahim Y; Stoddard GJ; Johnstone E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Feb; 38(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 33241427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical counseling tool predicting supernumerary embryos after a fresh IVF cycle.
    Ibrahim Y; Stoddard G; Johnstone E
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 May; 37(5):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 32152909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study.
    Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; McLernon DJ; Bhattacharya S; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.
    Zaat T; Zagers M; Mol F; Goddijn M; van Wely M; Mastenbroek S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Feb; 2(2):CD011184. PubMed ID: 33539543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.
    Whynott RM; Summers KM; Ball GD; Van Voorhis BJ; Sparks A
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 35216830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
    JOINT SOGC-CFAS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External validation of models for predicting cumulative live birth over multiple complete cycles of IVF treatment.
    Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Oct; 38(10):1998-2010. PubMed ID: 37632223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.
    Wong KM; van Wely M; Mol F; Repping S; Mastenbroek S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 3(3):CD011184. PubMed ID: 28349510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis.
    Bosdou JK; Venetis CA; Tarlatzis BC; Grimbizis GF; Kolibianakis EM
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):491-505. PubMed ID: 30689865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards single embryo transfer? Modelling clinical outcomes of potential treatment choices using multiple data sources: predictive models and patient perspectives.
    Roberts S; McGowan L; Hirst W; Brison D; Vail A; Lieberman B
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jul; 14(38):1-237. PubMed ID: 20684810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
    Seifer DB; Tal O; Wantman E; Edul P; Baker VL
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):385-93.e3. PubMed ID: 26515380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. There is no evidence that the time from egg retrieval to embryo transfer affects live birth rates in a freeze-all strategy.
    Lattes K; Checa MA; Vassena R; Brassesco M; Vernaeve V
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):368-374. PubMed ID: 27986819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elective freezing of embryos versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF: a multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK (E-Freeze).
    Maheshwari A; Bell JL; Bhide P; Brison D; Child T; Chong HY; Cheong Y; Cole C; Coomarasamy A; Cutting R; Hardy P; Hamoda H; Juszczak E; Khalaf Y; Kurinczuk JJ; Lavery S; Linsell L; Macklon N; Mathur R; Pundir J; Raine-Fenning N; Rajkohwa M; Scotland G; Stanbury K; Troup S; Bhattacharya S
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):476-487. PubMed ID: 34999830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cost-effectiveness analysis of freeze-only or fresh embryo transfer in IVF of non-PCOS women.
    Le KD; Vuong LN; Ho TM; Dang VQ; Pham TD; Pham CT; Norman RJ; Mol BWJ
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1907-1914. PubMed ID: 30239784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oocyte or embryo number needed to optimize live birth and cumulative live birth rates in mild stimulation IVF cycles.
    Datta AK; Campbell S; Felix N; Singh JSH; Nargund G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Aug; 43(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 34140227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies.
    Bosch E; De Vos M; Humaidan P
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():67. PubMed ID: 32153506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ART in Europe, 2019: results generated from European registries by ESHRE†.
    ; Smeenk J; Wyns C; De Geyter C; Kupka M; Bergh C; Cuevas Saiz I; De Neubourg D; Rezabek K; Tandler-Schneider A; Rugescu I; Goossens V
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2321-2338. PubMed ID: 37847771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.