BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33242678)

  • 1. Feasibility, tolerability, and safety of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (hyfosy). multicenter, prospective Spanish study.
    Engels V; Medina M; Antolín E; Ros C; Amaro A; De-Guirior C; Manzour N; Sotillo L; De la Cuesta R; Rodríguez R; San-Frutos L; Peralta S; Martin-Martínez A; Alcázar JL
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):102004. PubMed ID: 33242678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K; Out R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonohysterosalpingography: Comparison of foam and saline solution.
    Piccioni MG; Riganelli L; Filippi V; Fuggetta E; Colagiovanni V; Imperiale L; Caccetta J; Panici PB; Porpora MG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Feb; 45(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 27753111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): Tolerability, safety and the occurrence of pregnancy post-procedure.
    Tanaka K; Chua J; Cincotta R; Ballard EL; Duncombe G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 58(1):114-118. PubMed ID: 28949014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.
    Van Schoubroeck D; Van den Bosch T; Ameye L; Boes AS; D'Hooghe T; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 25092501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.
    Emanuel MH; van Vliet M; Weber M; Exalto N
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated three-dimensional coded contrast imaging hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography: feasibility in office tubal patency testing.
    Exacoustos C; Di Giovanni A; Szabolcs B; Romeo V; Romanini ME; Luciano D; Zupi E; Arduini D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 22648792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with saline medium (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Lim SL; Jung JJ; Yu SL; Rajesh H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():168-172. PubMed ID: 26547487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
    Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of a new gel foam for the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Van Schoubroeck D; Van den Bosch T; Meuleman C; Tomassetti C; D'Hooghe T; Timmerman D
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 23296258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With a Saline-Air Device Is Equivalent to Hysterosalpingography Only in the Presence of Tubal Patency.
    Robertshaw IM; Sroga JM; Batcheller AE; Martinez AM; Winter TC; Sinning K; Maxwell R; Lindheim SR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 27126400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does hysterosalpingo-foam sonography have any therapeutic effect? A systematic review.
    Piccioni MG; Tabacco S; Merlino L; Del Negro V; Mazzeo A; Logoteta A; Del Prete F; Riganelli L; Giannini A; Monti M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2020 Feb; 72(1):55-58. PubMed ID: 32153165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis following hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy).
    Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Szczeklik W; Martins WP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):831-834. PubMed ID: 31219636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.
    van Welie N; van Rijswijk J; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 35220432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pain Intensity During Ultrasound Assessment of Uterine Cavity and Tubal Patency With and Without Painkillers: Prospective Observational Study.
    Ludwin I; Martins WP; Nastri CO; Ludwin A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 28159714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spontaneous pregnancy rates in infertile women after sequential hydrosonography and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.
    Melcer Y; Shamir-Kaholi N; Vainer-Rotbart S; Pekar-Zlotin M; Youngster M; Gat I; Maymon R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():219-222. PubMed ID: 35231747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency in endometriosis patients.
    Moro F; Tropea A; Selvaggi L; Scarinci E; Lanzone A; Apa R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():22-5. PubMed ID: 25597884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.