These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33243266)
1. Fully-customized distraction assembly for maxillofacial distraction osteogenesis: a novel device and its experimental accuracy verification. Kang SH; Tak HJ; Park HW; Kim JU; Lee SH Head Face Med; 2020 Nov; 16(1):31. PubMed ID: 33243266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A distraction assembly system with fully-customized fixation plate unit and factory-manufactured distraction unit: Overview and accuracy validation for mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Kang SH; Lee SH J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Oct; 125(5S2):101992. PubMed ID: 39079599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted surgery in therapeutic strategy distraction osteogenesis of hemifacial microsomia: Accuracy and predictability. Tan A; Chai Y; Mooi W; Chen X; Xu H; Zin MA; Lin L; Zhang Y; Yang X; Chai G J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 30583926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of a newly designed mandibular distraction device for navigation surgery in goats. Cai M; Chen Y; Lu X; Xu L; Wang X; Shen G J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1704-1709. PubMed ID: 28865846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Error analysis of a CAD/CAM method for unidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Sun H; Li B; Zhao Z; Zhang L; Shen SG; Wang X Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 23583007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation-guided navigation for vector control in pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Badiali G; Cutolo F; Roncari A; Marchetti C; Bianchi A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):969-980. PubMed ID: 28347627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical guide assistant mandibular distraction osteogenesis and sagittal split osteotomy in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Shi L; Liu W; Yin L; Feng S; Xu S; Zhang ZY J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):498-500. PubMed ID: 25699536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resorbable Plates Prevent Regression in Pediatric Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis. Richland BK; Ellstrom C; Ahmad A; Jaffurs D Ann Plast Surg; 2017 May; 78(5 Suppl 4):S204-S207. PubMed ID: 28350556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Navigation-assisted mandibular body distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in goats. Cai M; Shen G; Cheng AH; Lin Y; Yu D; Ye M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24331570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone. Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of three-dimensional printing to assess transport vectors in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Shah S; O'Connor R; Watson J; Srinivasan D; Sidebottom A Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 55(1):74-76. PubMed ID: 27118615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and surgical application of a custom implant that enables a vertical vector of mandibular distraction. Gonzalez Alvarez A; Dovgalski L; Evans PL; Key S Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Oct; 234(10):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 32666882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of mandibular distractor orientation: an animal model analysis. Cope JB; Samchukov ML; Cherkashin AM; Wolford LM; Franco P J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Aug; 57(8):952-62; discussion 963-4. PubMed ID: 10437723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: an experimental investigation. al Ruhaimi KA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 30(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 11420905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with newly designed electromechanical distractor. Aykan A; Ugurlutan R; Zor F; Ozturk S J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1519-23. PubMed ID: 24914755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a CAD/CAM surgical template for mandibular distraction: a preliminary study. Li B; Sun H; Zeng F; Zhang T; Wang X Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 56(9):814-819. PubMed ID: 30293804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note. d'Hauthuille C; Taha F; Devauchelle B; Testelin S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15695051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible. Part III: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and horizontal (mediolateral) movements. Hollier LH; Rowe NM; Mackool RJ; Williams JK; Kim JH; Longaker MT; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Mar; 11(2):83-95. PubMed ID: 11314135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Qualitative assesement of newly formed bone after distraction osteogenesis of mandible in patients with facial asymmetry using 3 dimensional computed tomography. Datarkar A; Valvi B; Parmar S; Patil J J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(3):410-414. PubMed ID: 34040955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Gateno J; Allen ME; Teichgraeber JF; Messersmith ML J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):985-90; discussion 990-1. PubMed ID: 10981978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]