These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3324330)
1. [Increased risk of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters covered with transparent adhesive polyurethane bandages, compared to classical gauze bandages]. Meylan PR Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Dec; 117(50):2013-6. PubMed ID: 3324330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management. Maki DG; Stolz SS; Wheeler S; Mermel LA Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1729-37. PubMed ID: 7956275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients. Tripepi-Bova KA; Woods KD; Loach MC Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9283675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites. Madeo M; Martin C; Nobbs A J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 9369626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing. Maki DG; Ringer M JAMA; 1987 Nov; 258(17):2396-403. PubMed ID: 3118061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings. Hoffmann KK; Western SA; Kaiser DL; Wenzel RP; Groschel DH Am J Infect Control; 1988 Jun; 16(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 3408013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks. Hoffmann KK; Weber DJ; Samsa GP; Rutala WA JAMA; 1992 Apr; 267(15):2072-6. PubMed ID: 1532429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of gauze versus transparent dressings for peripheral intravenous catheter sites. Pettit DM; Kraus V Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 30(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 7567574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized study comparing a transparent polyurethane dressing to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites. Craven DE; Lichtenberg DA; Kunches LM; McDonough AT; Gonzalez MI; Heeren TC; McCabe WR Infect Control; 1985 Sep; 6(9):361-6. PubMed ID: 3850859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters. Koh DB; Gowardman JR; Rickard CM; Robertson IK; Brown A Crit Care Med; 2008 Feb; 36(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 18216598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Central venous catheter related infections: comparison of polyurethane film and gauze/tape dressing]. Cicolini G; di Labio L; Copetti M; Lazzari S; Bucci I Prof Inferm; 2008; 61(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18462569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing transparent polyurethane and hydrocolloid dressings for central venous catheters. Nikoletti S; Leslie G; Gandossi S; Coombs G; Wilson R Am J Infect Control; 1999 Dec; 27(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 10586152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravascular catheter colonization and related bloodstream infection in the heart surgery intensive care unit. Hashemzadeh K; Ghotaslou R; Dehdilani M Saudi Med J; 2008 Jul; 29(7):1018-23. PubMed ID: 18626533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a transparent polyurethane dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter care. Peterson PJ; Freeman PT NITA; 1982; 5(6):387-90. PubMed ID: 6924087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative safety and costs of transparent versus gauze wound dressings in intravenous catheterization. Chico-Padrón RM; Carrión-García L; Delle-Vedove-Rosales L; González-Vargas CS; Marrero-Perera M; Medina-Chico S; Rodríguez-Díaz MP; Alonso-Díaz M; Jiménez-Sosa A J Nurs Care Qual; 2011; 26(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 21407090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. Conly JM; Grieves K; Peters B J Infect Dis; 1989 Feb; 159(2):310-9. PubMed ID: 2644372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective study of 3165 patients. Lee WL; Chen HL; Tsai TY; Lai IC; Chang WC; Huang CH; Fang CT Am J Infect Control; 2009 Oct; 37(8):683-6. PubMed ID: 19559502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel technologies can provide effective dressing and securement for peripheral arterial catheters: A pilot randomised controlled trial in the operating theatre and the intensive care unit. Reynolds H; Taraporewalla K; Tower M; Mihala G; Tuffaha HW; Fraser JF; Rickard CM Aust Crit Care; 2015 Aug; 28(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 25583412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peripheral intravenous catheter dressing and securement practice is associated with site complications and suboptimal dressing integrity: A secondary analysis of 40,637 catheters. Corley A; Ullman AJ; Mihala G; Ray-Barruel G; Alexandrou E; Rickard CM Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Dec; 100():103409. PubMed ID: 31629208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]