These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction. Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of image reconstruction bias on PET/CT 90Y dosimetry after radioembolization. Tapp KN; Lea WB; Johnson MS; Tann M; Fletcher JW; Hutchins GD J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24982437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative (90)Y image reconstruction in PET. Willowson K; Forwood N; Jakoby BW; Smith AM; Bailey DL Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7153-9. PubMed ID: 23127106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization. Martí-Climent JM; Prieto E; Elosúa C; Rodríguez-Fraile M; Domínguez-Prado I; Vigil C; García-Velloso MJ; Arbizu J; Peñuelas I; Richter JA Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):092503. PubMed ID: 25186412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-dose 90Y PET/CT imaging optimized for lesion detectability and quantitative accuracy: a phantom study to assess the feasibility of pretherapy imaging to plan the therapeutic dose. Khazaee M; Kamali-Asl A; Geramifar P; Rahmim A Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):985-997. PubMed ID: 28902765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for imaging the in vivo yttrium-90 microsphere distribution after liver radioembolization. Elschot M; Vermolen BJ; Lam MG; de Keizer B; van den Bosch MA; de Jong HW PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e55742. PubMed ID: 23405207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a BGO PET/CT scanner. Reynés-Llompart G; Gámez-Cenzano C; Vercher-Conejero JL; Sabaté-Llobera A; Calvo-Malvar N; Martí-Climent JM Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3214-3222. PubMed ID: 29782657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System. Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of post-treatment PET-based dosimetry software for hepatic radioembolization of Yttrium-90 microspheres. Maughan NM; Garcia-Ramirez J; Arpidone M; Swallen A; Laforest R; Goddu SM; Parikh PJ; Zoberi JE Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2394-2402. PubMed ID: 30742714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [ Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 90Y PET-based dosimetry after selective internal radiotherapy treatments. D'Arienzo M; Chiaramida P; Chiacchiararelli L; Coniglio A; Cianni R; Salvatori R; Ruzza A; Scopinaro F; Bagni O Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):633-40. PubMed ID: 22407156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radioembolization lung shunt estimation based on a Kunnen B; van der Velden S; Bastiaannet R; Lam MGEH; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4744-4753. PubMed ID: 30179259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A gate evaluation of the sources of error in quantitative Strydhorst J; Carlier T; Dieudonné A; Conti M; Buvat I Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5320-5329. PubMed ID: 28105711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection. Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]