These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33246749)
1. Critical analytical parameters for faecal sludge characterisation informing the application of thermal treatment processes. Krueger BC; Fowler GD; Templeton MR J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111658. PubMed ID: 33246749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Faecal sludge pyrolysis: Understanding the relationships between organic composition and thermal decomposition. Krueger BC; Fowler GD; Templeton MR; Septien S J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113456. PubMed ID: 34364246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities. Getahun S; Septien S; Mata J; Somorin T; Mabbett I; Buckley C J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110267. PubMed ID: 32148321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rheological characteristics of faecal sludge from VIP latrines and implications on pit emptying. Septien S; Pocock J; Teba L; Velkushanova K; Buckley CA J Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 228():149-157. PubMed ID: 30218901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resource recovery and biochar characteristics from full-scale faecal sludge treatment and co-treatment with agricultural waste. Krueger BC; Fowler GD; Templeton MR; Moya B Water Res; 2020 Feb; 169():115253. PubMed ID: 31707178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods to reliably estimate faecal sludge quantities and qualities for the design of treatment technologies and management solutions. Strande L; Schoebitz L; Bischoff F; Ddiba D; Okello F; Englund M; Ward BJ; Niwagaba CB J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():898-907. PubMed ID: 30005415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing nutrient flows in septic tanks by eliciting expert judgement: a promising method in the context of developing countries. Montangero A; Belevi H Water Res; 2007 Mar; 41(5):1052-64. PubMed ID: 17223156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Source separation of human excreta: Effect on resource recovery via pyrolysis. Koulouri ME; Templeton MR; Fowler GD J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117782. PubMed ID: 37015142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-country analysis of faecal sludge dewatering. Gold M; Harada H; Therrien JD; Nishida T; Cunningham M; Semiyaga S; Fujii S; Dorea C; Nguyen VA; Strande L Environ Technol; 2018 Dec; 39(23):3077-3087. PubMed ID: 28866955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microwaving human faecal sludge as a viable sanitation technology option for treatment and value recovery - A critical review. Afolabi OOD; Sohail M J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():401-415. PubMed ID: 27836558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Material flow analysis as a tool for sustainable sanitation planning in developing countries: case study of Arba Minch, Ethiopia. Meinzinger F; Kröger K; Otterpohl R Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(10):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19474484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Faecal sludge in Accra, Ghana: problems of urban provision. Boot NL; Scott RE Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 19657157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a difference in prevalence of helminths between households using ecological sanitation and those using traditional pit latrines? A latrine based cross sectional comparative study in Malawi. Kumwenda S; Msefula C; Kadewa W; Diness Y; Kato C; Morse T; Ngwira B BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jun; 10(1):200. PubMed ID: 28599671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical review on sludge management from onsite sanitation systems: A knowledge to be revised in the current situation. Chandana N; Rao B Environ Res; 2022 Jan; 203():111812. PubMed ID: 34363803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Faecal sludge containment characteristics and their implications on safe desludging in unplanned settlements of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Seleman A; Gabrielsson S; Kimwaga R J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():112924. PubMed ID: 34147994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fecal Sludge Management in Low Income Settlements: Case Study of Nakuru, Kenya. Simiyu S; Chumo I; Mberu B Front Public Health; 2021; 9():750309. PubMed ID: 34708018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sludge bomb: The impending sludge emptying and treatment crisis in Blantyre, Malawi. Yesaya M; Tilley E J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111474. PubMed ID: 33039699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the compressional rheology of fresh faeces: Evidence for improving community scale sanitation through localised dewatering. Mercer E; Usher SP; McAdam EJ; Stoner B; Bajón-Fernández Y Water Res; 2021 Oct; 204():117526. PubMed ID: 34461495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing inter and intra-variation in the characteristics of faecal sludge from Vadgaon Maval, Maharashtra: For better faecal sludge management in India. Chandana N; Rao B J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 300():113634. PubMed ID: 34507059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Community Faecal Management Strategies and Perceptions on Sludge Use in Agriculture. Mamera M; van Tol JJ; Aghoghovwia MP; Mapetere GT Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 32531878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]