These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33247573)

  • 1. Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Godoy-Reina I; Moreu-Burgos G; González-Jaranay M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 Mar; 26(2):e226-e237. PubMed ID: 33247573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant Stability Quotients of Osteotome Bone Expansion and Conventional Drilling Technique for 4.1 mm Diameter Implant at Posterior Mandible.
    Hong HH; Hong A; Yang LY; Chang WY; Huang YF; Lin YT
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 27665748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional Drilling Versus Piezosurgery for Implant Site Preparation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Sendyk DI; de Oliveira NK; Pannuti CM; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Wennerberg A; Deboni MCZ
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Oct; 44(5):400-405. PubMed ID: 29583059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the effect of preparation of the implant sites with piezosurgery and conventional drilling on the stability of implants at 5-months follow-up.
    Soheilifar S; Bidgoli M; Houshyar E; Farhadian M; Ghamari A
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2018; 28(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29772986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Piezoelectric surgery versus conventional drilling for implant site preparation: a meta-analysis.
    Amghar-Maach S; Sánchez-Torres A; Camps-Font O; Gay-Escoda C
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Oct; 62(4):391-396. PubMed ID: 29843978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-speed drilling without irrigation versus conventional drilling for dental implant osteotomy preparation: a systematic review.
    Bernabeu-Mira JC; Soto-Peñaloza D; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Camacho-Alonso F; Rivas-Ballester R; Peñarrocha-Oltra D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4251-4267. PubMed ID: 33893557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analysis of endosteal implants placed by using the osseodensification technique in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gaikwad AM; Joshi AA; Nadgere JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 33139057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Piezoelectric bone surgery for implant site preparation compared with conventional drilling techniques: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
    Stacchi C; Bassi F; Troiano G; Rapani A; Lombardi T; Jokstad A; Sennerby L; Schierano G
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2020; 13(2):141-158. PubMed ID: 32424381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover design.
    Canullo L; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M; Rocio AG; Penarrocha-Diago M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1336-43. PubMed ID: 24147994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant stability using piezoelectric bone surgery compared with conventional drilling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    García-Moreno S; González-Serrano J; López-Pintor RM; Pardal-Peláez B; Hernández G; Martínez-González JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 47(11):1453-1464. PubMed ID: 29615293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and insertional torque (IT) stability comparisons of implants placed using osteotomes versus drilling techniques: A preliminary case study.
    Xing Y; Khandelwal N; Petrov S; Drew HJ; Mupparapu M
    Quintessence Int; 2015 Oct; 46(9):789-98. PubMed ID: 26159207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of implant site preparation affecting the quality of osseointegrated implants in the maxillary aesthetic zone.
    Sallam HM; Khalifa GA; Khalifa FA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 48(7):645-652. PubMed ID: 32505529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the Drilling Technique for Implant Site Preparation Enhance Implant Success in Low-Density Bone? A Systematic Review.
    El-Kholey KE; Elkomy A
    Implant Dent; 2019 Oct; 28(5):500-509. PubMed ID: 31205268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of platelet concentrates on implant stability and marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qu C; Luo F; Hong G; Wan Q
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):579. PubMed ID: 34772376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Implant Stability Between Conventional Drilling and Piezosurgical Implant Bed Preparation Techniques.
    Kjaergaard M; Nguyen VG; Brandt J; Pouchet J; Weigl PM
    J Oral Implantol; 2023 Feb; 49(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 34091662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative radiographic and resonance frequency analyses of the peri-implant tissue after dental implants placement using flap and flapless techniques: an experimental study on domestic pigs.
    Vlahović Z; Mihailović B; Lazić Z; Golubović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Jun; 70(6):586-94. PubMed ID: 23885526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical analysis of the stability of dental implants after preparation of the site by conventional drilling or piezosurgery.
    da Silva Neto UT; Joly JC; Gehrke SA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 52(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 24268822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Oversized Drilling on Implant Survival and Stability Versus Traditional Drilling Technique: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Seleem A; Tawfik OK; El-Nahass H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):771-778. PubMed ID: 34411219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro comparison of resonance frequency analysis devices to evaluate implant stability of narrow diameter implants at varying drilling speeds in dense artificial bone blocks.
    Romanos GE; Bastardi DJ; Kakar A; Moore R; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Javed F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1023-1027. PubMed ID: 31464362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Drilling Protocol and Bone Density on the Stability of Implants According to Different Macrogeometries of the Implant Used: Results of an In Vitro Study.
    Pérez-Pevida E; Cherro R; Camps-Font O; Piqué N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(5):955-964. PubMed ID: 32991646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.