172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33247580)
1. Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study.
Diniz PB; Sena-Filho M; Graner KM; Mariz BA; Reis LA; Almeida OP; Jorge J
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 Jan; 26(1):e8-e13. PubMed ID: 33247580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies.
Campbell WS; Hinrichs SH; Lele SM; Baker JJ; Lazenby AJ; Talmon GA; Smith LM; West WW
Hum Pathol; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1713-21. PubMed ID: 24913758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic concordance between whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in cytopathology: A systematic review.
Girolami I; Pantanowitz L; Marletta S; Brunelli M; Mescoli C; Parisi A; Barresi V; Parwani A; Neil D; Scarpa A; Rossi ED; Eccher A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Jan; 128(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31600035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concordance, intra- and inter-observer agreements between light microscopy and whole slide imaging for samples acquired by EUS in pancreatic solid lesions.
Larghi A; Fornelli A; Lega S; Ragazzi M; Carlinfante G; Baccarini P; Fabbri C; Pierotti P; Tallini G; Bondi A; de Biase D
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1574-1579. PubMed ID: 31147212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer histologic grading using digital microscopy: concordance and outcome association.
Rakha EA; Aleskandarani M; Toss MS; Green AR; Ball G; Ellis IO; Dalton LW
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Aug; 71(8):680-686. PubMed ID: 29535212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole slide imaging compared with light microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical neuropathology: a validation study.
Alassiri A; Almutrafi A; Alsufiani F; Al Nehkilan A; Al Salim A; Musleh H; Aziz M; Khalbuss W
Ann Saudi Med; 2020; 40(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 32026707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deep learning supported mitoses counting on whole slide images: A pilot study for validating breast cancer grading in the clinical workflow.
van Bergeijk SA; Stathonikos N; Ter Hoeve ND; Lafarge MW; Nguyen TQ; van Diest PJ; Veta M
J Pathol Inform; 2023; 14():100316. PubMed ID: 37273455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for primary surgical pathology diagnosis of prostate biopsies.
Rao V; Subramanian P; Sali AP; Menon S; Desai SB
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2021; 64(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 33433413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of mitotic cell quantification via microscopy and multiple whole-slide scanners.
Tabata K; Uraoka N; Benhamida J; Hanna MG; Sirintrapun SJ; Gallas BD; Gong Q; Aly RG; Emoto K; Matsuda KM; Hameed MR; Klimstra DS; Yagi Y
Diagn Pathol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 31238983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in two grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia: A multi-centre study in India.
Ranganathan K; Kavitha L; Sharada P; Bavle RM; Rao RS; Pattanshetty SM; Hazarey VK; Madhura MG; Nagaraj T; Lingappa A; Warnakulasuriya S
J Oral Pathol Med; 2020 Oct; 49(9):948-955. PubMed ID: 32516857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interinstitutional whole slide imaging teleconsultation service development: assessment using internal training and clinical consultation cases.
Jones NC; Nazarian RM; Duncan LM; Kamionek M; Lauwers GY; Tambouret RH; Wu CL; Nielsen GP; Brachtel EF; Mark EJ; Sadow PM; Grabbe JP; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 25415180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Diagnostic Concordance of Whole Slide Imaging and Light Microscopy: A Systematic Review.
Goacher E; Randell R; Williams B; Treanor D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jan; 141(1):151-161. PubMed ID: 27399211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy.
Ginter PS; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar A; Wilson P; Harigopal M
Mod Pathol; 2021 Apr; 34(4):701-709. PubMed ID: 33077923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole slide images for primary diagnostics in dermatopathology: a feasibility study.
Al-Janabi S; Huisman A; Vink A; Leguit RJ; Offerhaus GJ; Ten Kate FJ; van Dijk MR; van Diest PJ
J Clin Pathol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 22031590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of digital microscopy in the histopathological diagnoses of oral diseases.
Araújo ALD; Amaral-Silva GK; Fonseca FP; Palmier NR; Lopes MA; Speight PM; de Almeida OP; Vargas PA; Santos-Silva AR
Virchows Arch; 2018 Sep; 473(3):321-327. PubMed ID: 29858684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a University Hospital.
Ordi J; Castillo P; Saco A; Del Pino M; Ordi O; Rodríguez-Carunchio L; Ramírez J
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25355520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital Whole Slide Imaging Compared With Light Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology.
Borowsky AD; Glassy EF; Wallace WD; Kallichanda NS; Behling CA; Miller DV; Oswal HN; Feddersen RM; Bakhtar OR; Mendoza AE; Molden DP; Saffer HL; Wixom CR; Albro JE; Cessna MH; Hall BJ; Lloyd IE; Bishop JW; Darrow MA; Gui D; Jen KY; Walby JAS; Bauer SM; Cortez DA; Gandhi P; Rodgers MM; Rodriguez RA; Martin DR; McConnell TG; Reynolds SJ; Spigel JH; Stepenaskie SA; Viktorova E; Magari R; Wharton KA; Qiu J; Bauer TW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Oct; 144(10):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 32057275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytomorphological description and intra-observer agreement in whole slide imaging for canine lymphoma.
Bonsembiante F; Martini V; Bonfanti U; Casarin G; Trez D; Gelain ME
Vet J; 2018 Jun; 236():96-101. PubMed ID: 29871757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review.
Araújo ALD; Arboleda LPA; Palmier NR; Fonsêca JM; de Pauli Paglioni M; Gomes-Silva W; Ribeiro ACP; Brandão TB; Simonato LE; Speight PM; Fonseca FP; Lopes MA; de Almeida OP; Vargas PA; Madrid Troconis CC; Santos-Silva AR
Virchows Arch; 2019 Mar; 474(3):269-287. PubMed ID: 30685784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.
Davidson TM; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Onega T; Allison KH; Mercan E; Brunyé TT; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():11. PubMed ID: 31057980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
