These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33247594)

  • 1. Joint calibrated estimation of inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights for marginal structural models.
    Yiu S; Su L
    Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 33247594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity analysis for calibrated inverse probability-of-censoring weighted estimators under non-ignorable dropout.
    Su L; Seaman SR; Yiu S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1374-1391. PubMed ID: 35410545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Covariate association eliminating weights: a unified weighting framework for causal effect estimation.
    Yiu S; Su L
    Biometrika; 2018 Sep; 105(3):709-722. PubMed ID: 31031408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.
    Cheng C; Li F; Thomas LE; Li FF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1140-1151. PubMed ID: 35238335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causal inference in survival analysis using longitudinal observational data: Sequential trials and marginal structural models.
    Keogh RH; Gran JM; Seaman SR; Davies G; Vansteelandt S
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(13):2191-2225. PubMed ID: 37086186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of the causal effects of time-varying treatments in nested case-control studies using marginal structural Cox models.
    Takeuchi Y; Hagiwawa Y; Komukai S; Matsuyama Y
    Biometrics; 2024 Jan; 80(1):. PubMed ID: 38465985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Flexible Modeling of Continuous Covariates in Inverse-Weighted Estimators.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EEM; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 188(6):1181-1191. PubMed ID: 30649165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosing Covariate Balance Across Levels of Right-Censoring Before and After Application of Inverse-Probability-of-Censoring Weights.
    Jackson JW
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 188(12):2213-2221. PubMed ID: 31145432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propensity score analysis methods with balancing constraints: A Monte Carlo study.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):1119-1142. PubMed ID: 33525962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An inverse probability weighted regression method that accounts for right-censoring for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome.
    Yu Y; Zhang M; Mukherjee B
    Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3699-3715. PubMed ID: 37392070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological comparison of marginal structural model, time-varying Cox regression, and propensity score methods: the example of antidepressant use and the risk of hip fracture.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Souverein PC; Martín E; Gatto NM; Huerta C; Gardarsdottir H; Roes KC; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Mar; 25 Suppl 1():114-21. PubMed ID: 27038357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models.
    Saarela O; Stephens DA; Moodie EE; Klein MB
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25677103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal structural models for multilevel clustered data.
    Wu Y; Langworthy B; Wang M
    Biostatistics; 2022 Oct; 23(4):1056-1073. PubMed ID: 35904119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing versus modelling in weighted analysis of non-randomised studies with survival outcomes: A simulation study.
    Filla T; Schwender H; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(17):3140-3163. PubMed ID: 38801062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Causal Inference with Multilevel Data: A Comparison of Different Propensity Score Weighting Approaches.
    Fuentes A; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(6):916-939. PubMed ID: 34128730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal structural models for estimating the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy initiation on CD4 cell count.
    Cole SR; Hernán MA; Margolick JB; Cohen MH; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 162(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 16076835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joint modeling of concurrent binary outcomes in a longitudinal observational study using inverse probability of treatment weighting for treatment effect estimation.
    Agogo GO; Murphy TE; McAvay GJ; Allore HG
    Ann Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 35():53-58. PubMed ID: 31085069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.