145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33247894)
21. Incremental diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of double phase Tc-99m MIBI scintimammography for the detection of primary breast cancer additive to visual analysis.
Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Bae YT; Kim YK; Kim DS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jan; 83(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 14997043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Benign versus malignant breast disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography.
Fenlon HM; Phelan NC; O'Sullivan P; Tierney S; Gorey T; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9314988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The contribution of ultrasonography to the differential diagnosis of breast cancer.
Ciatto S; Rosselli del Turco M; Catarzi S; Morrone D
Neoplasma; 1994; 41(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 7870218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Diagnostic values of breast imaging and reporting data system and ultrasonic elastography for benign and malignant breast lesions].
Yang M; Gu XN; Liu F; Wang YY; Cai YL; Liu DM; Zhou WJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 93(39):3125-7. PubMed ID: 24417992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance evaluation of breast cancer diagnosis with mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Sun H; Li H; Si S; Qi S; Zhang W; Ma H; Liu S; Yingxue L; Qian W
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(5):805-813. PubMed ID: 30103371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Diagnostic evaluation of breast nodules].
Ciccarone M
Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Nov; 46(11):635-42. PubMed ID: 7854568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of benign breast biopsy on subsequent breast cancer detection practices.
Benedict S; Williams RD; Baron PL
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994 Oct; 21(9):1467-75. PubMed ID: 7816674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Stomper PC; Gelman RS
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves.
Buscombe JR; Cwikla JB; Holloway B; Hilson AJ
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11197976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Scope and limitations of diagnostics in breast disease--focussing on large core biopsy].
de Waal JC; Prechtel K; Weitz J; Staufer F; Pankratz-Hauer M; Nerlich A
Ultraschall Med; 2006 Oct; 27(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 16710815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Added value of semi-quantitative breast-specific gamma imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions compared to mammography, ultrasound and 3-T MRI.
Meissnitzer T; Seymer A; Keinrath P; Holzmannhofer J; Pirich C; Hergan K; Meissnitzer MW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 88(1051):20150147. PubMed ID: 25882690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Mamography and core biopsy value in diagnosis of nonpalpable breast tumors].
Ostapenko V; Mikalauskas T; Bruzas S; Mudenas A; Sabonis J; Tutkus J; Meskauskas R; Miliauskas P; Jackevicius A; Grinyte L
Medicina (Kaunas); 2004; 40(12):1165-9. PubMed ID: 15630342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer].
Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC
G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications: mammography versus mammography-sonography combination.
Marini C; Traino C; Cilotti A; Roncella M; Campori G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):17-26. PubMed ID: 12700541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Utilisation of electrical impedance tomography and/or ultrasound and mammography in breast disease diagnosis: a controlled study].
Xu F; Li MX; Jusko HZ; Jiang H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(18):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 28535624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
