110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33248820)
21. Investigation on mercury removal and recovery based on enhanced adsorption by activated coke.
An D; Sun X; Cheng X; Cui L; Zhang X; Zhao Y; Dong Y
J Hazard Mater; 2020 Feb; 384():121354. PubMed ID: 31615709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimization of magnetic powdered activated carbon for aqueous Hg(II) removal and magnetic recovery.
Faulconer EK; von Reitzenstein NV; Mazyck DW
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Jan; 199-200():9-14. PubMed ID: 22104766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solutions and chlor-alkali industry effluent by steam activated and sulphurised activated carbons prepared from bagasse pith: kinetics and equilibrium studies.
Anoop Krishnan K; Anirudhan TS
J Hazard Mater; 2002 May; 92(2):161-83. PubMed ID: 11992701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adsorption of aqueous Hg
Hsu CJ; Chen YH; Hsi HC
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 711():135172. PubMed ID: 31831244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Removal of vapor-phase elemental mercury from stack emissions with sulfur-impregnated activated carbon.
Sowlat MH; Abdollahi M; Gharibi H; Yunesian M; Rastkari N
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():1-34. PubMed ID: 24609516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Chemisorption and kinetic mechanisms of elemental mercury on immobilized V
Shen HZ; Yuan CS; Jing G; Hung CH; Liu CW
J Hazard Mater; 2019 Apr; 368():819-829. PubMed ID: 30743229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of H
Steinhaus J; Pasel C; Bläker C; Bathen D
ACS Omega; 2021 Jul; 6(26):16989-17001. PubMed ID: 34250357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of Oxygen on Hg
Ambrosy JM; Pasel C; Luckas M; Bittig M; Bathen D
ACS Omega; 2020 Jul; 5(28):17051-17061. PubMed ID: 32715190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of temperature and regeneration cycles on Hg capture and efficiency by structured Au/C regenerable sorbents.
Ballestero D; Gómez-Giménez C; García-Díez E; Juan R; Rubio B; Izquierdo MT
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():247-54. PubMed ID: 23774780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Equilibrium and heat of adsorption for organic vapors and activated carbons.
Ramirez D; Qi S; Rood MJ; Hay KJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Aug; 39(15):5864-71. PubMed ID: 16124327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of CO and CO
Zhou Q; Zhou J; Cao H; Xu X
ACS Omega; 2021 Feb; 6(4):2916-2924. PubMed ID: 33553910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Phosphonium-based Ionic Liquid Modified Activated Carbon from Mixed Recyclable Waste for Mercury(II) Uptake.
Habila MA; AlOthman ZA; Ghfar AA; Al-Zaben MIM; Alothman AAS; Abdeltawab AA; El-Marghany A; Sheikh M
Molecules; 2019 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 30764473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Inhibiting Mercury Re-emission and Enhancing Magnesia Recovery by Cobalt-Loaded Carbon Nanotubes in a Novel Magnesia Desulfurization Process.
Wang L; Qi T; Hu M; Zhang S; Xu P; Qi D; Wu S; Xiao H
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Oct; 51(19):11346-11353. PubMed ID: 28910083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrothermal properties of porous ceramic fiber media containing carbon materials.
Park S; Kwon YP; Kwon HC; Lee JH; Lee HW; Lee JC
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2007 Nov; 7(11):3776-9. PubMed ID: 18047056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mercury Sorption and Desorption on Gold: A Comparative Analysis of Surface Acoustic Wave and Quartz Crystal Microbalance-Based Sensors.
Kabir KM; Sabri YM; Esmaielzadeh Kandjani A; Matthews GI; Field M; Jones LA; Nafady A; Ippolito SJ; Bhargava SK
Langmuir; 2015 Aug; 31(30):8519-29. PubMed ID: 26169072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adsorption characteristics of activated carbon fibers (ACFs) for toluene: application in respiratory protection.
Balanay JA; Bartolucci AA; Lungu CT
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(3):133-43. PubMed ID: 24521063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Feasibility of regenerative adsorption of a hydrofluorocarbon (HFC-134a) using activated carbon fiber studied by the gaseous flow method.
Guahk YT; Jeon M; Moon S; Ohm T; Kim SG
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Jun; 411():125009. PubMed ID: 33453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High removal efficacy of Hg(II) and MeHg(II) ions from aqueous solution by organoalkoxysilane-grafted lignocellulosic waste biomass.
Saman N; Johari K; Song ST; Kong H; Cheu SC; Mat H
Chemosphere; 2017 Mar; 171():19-30. PubMed ID: 28002763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Noble metal-based sorbents: A way to avoid new waste after mercury removal.
Antuña-Nieto C; Rodríguez E; Lopez-Anton MA; García R; Martínez-Tarazona MR
J Hazard Mater; 2020 Dec; 400():123168. PubMed ID: 32563907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from agricultural by-product/waste.
Rao MM; Reddy DH; Venkateswarlu P; Seshaiah K
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):634-43. PubMed ID: 18313830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
