137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33249819)
1. Tailoring parametrectomy for early cervical cancer (Stage IA-IIA FIGO): a review on surgical, oncologic outcome and sexual function.
Plotti F; Ficarola F; Messina G; Terranova C; Montera R; Guzzo F; DE Cicco Nardone C; Rossini G; Schirò T; Gatti A; Luvero D; Feole L; Angioli R
Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 33249819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual function after modified radical hysterectomy (Piver II/Type B) vs. classic radical hysterectomy (Piver III/Type C2) for early stage cervical cancer. A prospective study.
Plotti F; Nelaj E; Sansone M; Antonelli E; Altavilla T; Angioli R; Benedetti Panici P
J Sex Med; 2012 Mar; 9(3):909-17. PubMed ID: 22372655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.
Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Spagnolo E; Clarizia R; Casadio P; Seracchioli R; Ghezzi F; Mautone D; Bruni F; Uccella S
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):e10. PubMed ID: 33300311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
van Gent MDJM; Rademaker M; van der Veer JCB; van Poelgeest MIE; Gaarenstroom KN; Putter H; Trimbos JBMZ; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 28704329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Bae JW; Han M; Cho YJ; Park JW; Oh SR; Kim SJ; Choe SY; Yun JH; Lee Y
Mol Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 12(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 31929888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life.
van Gent MD; Romijn LM; van Santen KE; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Maturitas; 2016 Dec; 94():30-38. PubMed ID: 27823742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review.
Basaran D; Dusek L; Majek O; Cibula D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):3033-40. PubMed ID: 25613389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 21st century role of Piver type II hysterectomy in FIGO stage IA, IB cervical cancer: a personal perspective.
Piver MS; Lee JY
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 18459541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Chinese expert consensus on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer].
Gynecologic Oncology Group, Chinese Obstetricians and Gynecologists Association
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 43(7):736-742. PubMed ID: 34289566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2017 Update on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy.
Querleu D; Cibula D; Abu-Rustum NR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(11):3406-3412. PubMed ID: 28785898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function recovery and quality of life in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Wu J; Liu X; Hua K; Hu C; Chen X; Lu X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jul; 20(5):905-9. PubMed ID: 20606542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerve-Sparing Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Critical Steps.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Bradbury M; Pérez-Benavente A; Franco-Camps S; Gil-Moreno A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1144-1145. PubMed ID: 29432901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
