136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33249819)
21. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study.
Landoni F; Maneo A; Zapardiel I; Zanagnolo V; Mangioni C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 22244909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Voiding recovery after radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer patients: An international prospective multicentre trial - SENTIX.
Zapardiel I; Kocian R; Köhler C; Klat J; Germanova A; Jacob A; Bajsova S; Böhmer G; Lay L; Gil-Ibañez B; Havelka P; Kipp B; Szewczyk G; Toth R; Staringer JC; De Santiago J; Coronado PJ; Poka R; Laky R; Luyckx M; Fastrez M; Dusek L; Hernandez A; Cibula D
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):729-734. PubMed ID: 33419610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of pelvic visceral functions after modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Wang W; Li B; Zuo J; Zhang G; Yang Y; Zeng H; Li X; Wu L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 24534225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radical vaginal hysterectomy with extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.
Savino L; Borruto F; Comparetto C; Massi GB
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001; 22(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11321490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic Radical Parametrectomy With Upper Vaginectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Occult Cervical Carcinoma After Extrafascial Hysterectomy.
Tran AQ; Sullivan SA; Gehrig PA; Soper JT; Boggess JF; Kim KH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):757-763. PubMed ID: 28254677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Update on urodynamic bladder dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Plotti F; Angioli R; Zullo MA; Sansone M; Altavilla T; Antonelli E; Montera R; Damiani P; Benedetti Panici P
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 21277788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nerve-sparing robotic radical hysterectomy: our technique.
Puntambekar SP; Lawande A; Desai R; Kenawadekar R; Joshi S; Joshi GA
J Robot Surg; 2014 Mar; 8(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 27637238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application research on nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for rectal function.
Su Y; Zhang M; Zhang W; Shi H
Pak J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jan; 30(1 Suppl):329-334. PubMed ID: 28625962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study.
Landoni F; Maneo A; Cormio G; Perego P; Milani R; Caruso O; Mangioni C
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jan; 80(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 11136561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Latest developments and review of the literature.
Kavallaris A; Zygouris D; Dafopoulos A; Kalogiannidis I; Terzakis E
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 25872326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: evolution of concepts.
Raspagliesi F; Ditto A; Hanozet F; Martinelli F; Solima E; Zanaboni F; Kusamura S; Fontanelli R
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S119-21. PubMed ID: 17727932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Makowski M; Nowak M; Szpakowski M; Władziński J; Serwach-Nowińska A; Janas Ł; Wilczyński JR
Prz Menopauzalny; 2014 Jun; 13(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 26327852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function.
Sakuragi N; Todo Y; Kudo M; Yamamoto R; Sato T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 15823132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
