These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33250954)

  • 1. Civil Forensic Evaluation in Psychological Injury and Law: Legal, Professional, and Ethical Considerations.
    Foote WE; Goodman-Delahunty J; Young G
    Psychol Inj Law; 2020; 13(4):327-353. PubMed ID: 33250954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical and Professional Considerations in the Forensic Assessment of Complex Trauma and Dissociation.
    Rocchio LM
    Psychol Inj Law; 2020; 13(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 32837675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The civil liability of the psychiatrist in Canada following the suicide of a patient: An analysis based on case law].
    Thibault G; Désautels S; Chamard-Bergeron T
    Sante Ment Que; 2023; 48(2):209-227. PubMed ID: 38578190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remote Forensic Psychological Assessment in Civil Cases: Considerations for Experts Assessing Harms from Early Life Abuse.
    Goldenson J; Josefowitz N
    Psychol Inj Law; 2021; 14(2):89-103. PubMed ID: 33758640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting the present: expert testimony and civil commitment.
    Schopp RF; Quattrocchi MR
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 10150376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuropsychologist experts and neurolaw: cases, controversies, and admissibility challenges.
    Kaufmann PM
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(6):739-55. PubMed ID: 24115139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic psychiatric evaluations: an overview of methods, ethical issues, and criminal and civil assessments.
    Sher L
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2015 May; 27(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25411982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Litigation involving sports-related spinal injuries: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the United States in the past 70 years.
    Zhang JK; Alimadadi A; ReVeal M; Del Valle AJ; Patel M; O'Malley DS; Mercier P; Mattei TA
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 36028214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry.
    Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causality in criminal forensic and in civil disability cases: Legal and psychological comparison.
    Young G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():114-20. PubMed ID: 26325348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward generally accepted forensic assessment practices among clinical neuropsychologists: a survey of professional practice and common test use.
    LaDuke C; Barr W; Brodale DL; Rabin LA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):145-164. PubMed ID: 28675974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What does impartiality mean in medico-legal psychiatry? An international survey.
    Niveau G; Godet T; Völlm B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101505. PubMed ID: 31706391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical issues in personality assessment in forensic psychology.
    Knapp S; VandeCreek L
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Oct; 77(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 11693856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A consideration of the relationship between the Rules of Court and the Code of Ethics in forensic psychiatry.
    Gaughwin PC
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2004; 38(1-2):20-5. PubMed ID: 14731190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A case law survey of the Personality Assessment Inventory: examining its role in civil and criminal trials.
    Mullen KL; Edens JF
    J Pers Assess; 2008 May; 90(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 18444127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.