These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33251562)

  • 1. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
    Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A finer-grained search reveals no evidence of the attentional capture by to-be-ignored features.
    Rheem H; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2441-2457. PubMed ID: 33913088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional Templates Are Sharpened through Differential Signal Enhancement, Not Differential Allocation of Attention.
    Kerzel D; Cong SH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 33(4):594-610. PubMed ID: 33464161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?
    Burgess E; Hauck C; De Pooter E; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):634-648. PubMed ID: 36207664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
    Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation.
    Kerzel D
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():20-31. PubMed ID: 30739056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature-based attention is functionally distinct from relation-based attention: The double dissociation between color-based capture and color-relation-based capture of attention.
    Du F; Jiao J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):480-93. PubMed ID: 26523490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of display-to-display feature changes on net cueing effects: Evidence for a contribution of object-file updating.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):908-919. PubMed ID: 31931666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.
    Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jul; 46(7):716-728. PubMed ID: 32271080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.
    Lin Z; Lu ZL; He S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2185-98. PubMed ID: 27068051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural correlates of goal-directed enhancement and suppression of visual stimuli in the absence of conscious perception.
    Travis SL; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1346-1364. PubMed ID: 30378084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.