These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33251942)
21. 2018 tallied facial soft tissue thicknesses for adults and sub-adults. Stephan CN Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():113-123. PubMed ID: 28988069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Facial soft tissue thickness in Yangtze River delta Han population: Accurate assessment and comparative analysis utilizing Cone-Beam CT. Deng C; Wang D; Chen J; Li K; Yang M; Chen Z; Zhu Z; Yin C; Chen P; Cao D; Yan B; Chen F Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Mar; 44():101693. PubMed ID: 32217445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. B-mode Ultrasound Measurement of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness for Craniofacial Identification: A Standardized Approach. Meikle B; Stephan CN J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):939-947. PubMed ID: 31671226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated reconstruction: Predictive models based on facial morphology matrices. Mbonani TM; L'Abbé EN; Ridel AF Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jun; 359():112026. PubMed ID: 38677157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Facial soft-tissue thickness in children: A study of a CTBC Brazilian sample. Baccarin LS; Beaini TL; Mazzilli LEN; Melani RFH Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 May; 68():102429. PubMed ID: 38484576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vertical Lip Position and Thickness in Facial Reconstruction: A Validation of Commonly Used Methods for Predicting the Position and Size of Lips. Zednikova Mala P; Veleminska J J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(4):1046-54. PubMed ID: 27364286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Skeletal dimensions as predictors for the shape of the nose in a South African sample: A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. Ridel AF; Demeter F; Liebenberg J; L'Abbé EN; Vandermeulen D; Oettlé AC Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():18-26. PubMed ID: 29800867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Turning the tables of sex distinction in craniofacial identification: Why females possess thicker facial soft tissues than males, not vice versa. Stephan CN; Preisler R; Bulut O; Bennett M Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 Oct; 161(2):283-95. PubMed ID: 27324815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visualising trends in dentition to lip mouth morphology using geometric morphometrics. Houlton TMR; Jooste N; Steyn M; Hemingway J PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274127. PubMed ID: 36054122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vivo facial soft tissue depths of a modern adult population from Germany. Thiemann N; Keil V; Roy U Int J Legal Med; 2017 Sep; 131(5):1455-1488. PubMed ID: 28417258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The study on facial soft tissue thickness using Han population in Xinjiang. Wang J; Zhao X; Mi C; Raza I Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():585.e1-585.e5. PubMed ID: 27216250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Soft-tissue thickness values using cone beam computed tomography: A literature review. Mele F; Santoro V; Lauretti C; Favia M; Angrisani C; Introna F; De Donno A Med Sci Law; 2021 Jan; 61(1_suppl):136-140. PubMed ID: 33591867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preliminary assessment of facial soft tissue thickness utilizing three-dimensional computed tomography models of living individuals. Parks CL; Richard AH; Monson KL Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():146.e1-146.e10. PubMed ID: 24529417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy and reliability of facial soft tissue depth measurements using cone beam computer tomography. Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jun; 199(1-3):9-14. PubMed ID: 20236780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Changes in face topography from supine-to-upright position-And soft tissue correction values for craniofacial identification. Munn L; Stephan CN Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():40-50. PubMed ID: 29852367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlation Between Sex and Facial Soft Tissue Characteristics Among Young Saudi Patients with Various Orthodontic Skeletal Malocclusions. Ajwa N; Alkhars FA; AlMubarak FH; Aldajani H; AlAli NM; Alhanabbi AH; Alsulaiman SA; Divakar DD Med Sci Monit; 2020 Feb; 26():e919771. PubMed ID: 32101535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Forensic facial approximation assessment: can application of different average facial tissue depth data facilitate recognition and establish acceptable level of resemblance? Herrera LM; Strapasson RAP; da Silva JVL; Melani RFH Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():311-319. PubMed ID: 27352136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation. Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Suetens P Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S147-58. PubMed ID: 16540276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Among Three Skeletal Classes in Adult Pakistani Subjects. Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1420-5. PubMed ID: 26260364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Will different sagittal and vertical skeletal types relate the soft tissue thickness: A study in Chinese female adults. Chu G; Han MQ; Ji LL; Li MJ; Zhou H; Chen T; Guo YC Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Feb; 42():101633. PubMed ID: 31855664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]