BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33252334)

  • 1. Technique and clinical applications of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in breast cancer evaluation: a pictorial essay.
    Sudhir R; Koppula V; Mandava A; Kamala S; Potlapalli A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Jan; 27(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 33252334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Adler G; Garbay JR; Delaloge S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18790584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls.
    Polat DS; Evans WP; Dogan BE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1267-1278. PubMed ID: 32877247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast enhanced dual energy spectral mammogram, an emerging addendum in breast imaging.
    Kariyappa KD; Gnanaprakasam F; Anand S; Krishnaswami M; Ramachandran M
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20150609. PubMed ID: 27610475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).
    Amato F; Bicchierai G; Cirone D; Depretto C; Di Naro F; Vanzi E; Scaperrotta G; Bartolotta TV; Miele V; Nori J
    Radiol Med; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 31773458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
    Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography: a promising new imaging tool in breast cancer detection.
    Lalji U; Lobbes M
    Womens Health (Lond); 2014 May; 10(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 24956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography: A Single-Institution Experience of the First 208 Cases.
    Lewis TC; Pizzitola VJ; Giurescu ME; Eversman WG; Lorans R; Robinson KA; Patel BK
    Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 27696576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular parameters are associated with the absence of enhancement of known breast cancers with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM)?
    Bicchierai G; Amato F; Vanzi B; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Di Naro F; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Cozzi D; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast; 2020 Dec; 54():15-24. PubMed ID: 32889303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of False-Positive Versus True-Positive Findings on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
    Amir T; Hogan MP; Jacobs S; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Jochelson MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):797-808. PubMed ID: 34817195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging.
    Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Muller S; Ebrahimi M; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051910. PubMed ID: 23635280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical uses of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in daily work: A pictorial review.
    Alexander S; Dulku G; Hashoul S; Taylor DB
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):473-478. PubMed ID: 31332941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Screening for Intermediate-Risk Women With a History of Lobular Neoplasia.
    Hogan MP; Amir T; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1486-1491. PubMed ID: 33787291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: Large-scale single-center experience.
    Bicchierai G; Tonelli P; Piacenti A; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Kaur Gill M; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 31999029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging.
    Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Saab-Puong S; Iordache R; Muller S; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081907. PubMed ID: 23927321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.