117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33252720)
1. Inadequate object positioning and improvement of automatic exposure control system calculations based on an empirical algorithm.
Furukawa Y; Matsubara K; Miyati T
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 44(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 33252720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of automatic and manual compensation methods for the calculation of tube currents during off-centered patient positioning with a noise-based automatic exposure control system in computed tomography.
Furukawa Y; Matsubara K; Tsutsumi Y
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 44(3):823-832. PubMed ID: 34297309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of CT Localizer Radiographs on Radiation Dose Associated With Automatic Tube Current Modulation: A Multivendor Study.
Paolicchi F; Bastiani L; Negri J; Caramella D
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 30704769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.
Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Reijonen V; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 24951205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs.
Bohrer E; Schäfer S; Mäder U; Noël PB; Krombach GA; Fiebich M
Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 27720574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.
McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic exposure control systems designed to maintain constant image noise: effects on computed tomography dose and noise relative to clinically accepted technique charts.
Favazza CP; Yu L; Leng S; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 25938214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inaccurate table height setting affects the organ-specific radiation dose in computed tomography.
Ishita Y; Urikura A; Yoshida T; Takiguchi K; Ikegaya M
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 151():110317. PubMed ID: 35468445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of table height displacement and patient center deviation on size-specific dose estimates calculated from computed tomography localizer radiographs.
Kuriyama K; Matsubara K; Hisahara S; Nagata Y; Nosaka R; Goto R; Yanano N; Shimizu K; Shoji T
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 43(2):665-672. PubMed ID: 32378125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dependency of prescribed CT dose on table height, patient size, and localizer acquisition for one clinical MDCT.
Winslow J; Zhang Y; Koweek L; Samei E
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():56-60. PubMed ID: 30471820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms.
Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems.
Iball GR; Moore AC; Crawford EJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 27455490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4567-76. PubMed ID: 18975703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac computed tomography angiography with automatic tube potential selection: effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Ghoshhajra BB; Engel LC; Károlyi M; Sidhu MS; Wai B; Barreto M; Shanmugam U; Hoffmann U; Brady TJ; Kalra M; Abbara S
J Thorac Imaging; 2013 Jan; 28(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 22847638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
