These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33254859)

  • 21. Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones I. Analytical modeling of source strength functions and plume response.
    Falta RW; Suresh Rao P; Basu N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Aug; 78(4):259-80. PubMed ID: 16019108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Towards Fast Plume Source Estimation with a Mobile Robot.
    Magalhães H; Baptista R; Macedo J; Marques L
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33302494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodology for comparing source and plume remediation alternatives.
    Falta RW
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(2):272-85. PubMed ID: 18266737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Study on determination of plume velocity by passive differential optical absorption spectroscopy].
    Li A; Xie PH; Liu WQ; Liu JG; Dou K; Lin YH
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2008 Oct; 28(10):2214-7. PubMed ID: 19123375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inverse modelling for real-time estimation of radiological consequences in the early stage of an accidental radioactivity release.
    Pecha P; Šmídl V
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Nov; 164():377-394. PubMed ID: 27619559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Source inversion of both long- and short-lived radionuclide releases from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident using on-site gamma dose rates.
    Li X; Sun S; Hu X; Huang H; Li H; Morino Y; Wang S; Yang X; Shi J; Fang S
    J Hazard Mater; 2019 Nov; 379():120770. PubMed ID: 31252340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feasibility Assessment of Long-Term Electrical Resistivity Monitoring of a Nitrate Plume.
    Robinson J; Johnson T; Rockhold M
    Ground Water; 2020 Mar; 58(2):224-237. PubMed ID: 31041815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stable plume rise in a shear layer.
    Overcamp TJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Mar; 57(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 17385599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rebound of a coal tar creosote plume following partial source zone treatment with permanganate.
    Thomson NR; Fraser MJ; Lamarche C; Barker JF; Forsey SP
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov; 102(1-2):154-71. PubMed ID: 18757111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Iterative image-domain decomposition for dual-energy CT.
    Niu T; Dong X; Petrongolo M; Zhu L
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041901. PubMed ID: 24694132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanisms that influence the interactions between remediation agent injection and contamination plume variation.
    Song X; Chen J; Xu Q; Wang Y
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 May; 231():103631. PubMed ID: 32193007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An atmospheric dispersion model for the environmental impact assessment of thermal power plants in Japan--a method for evaluating topographical effects.
    Ichikawa Y; Sada K
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Mar; 52(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 11924863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of a Kalman filter based method for on-line estimation of atmospheric dispersion parameters using radiation monitoring data.
    Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 15572402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enabling probabilistic retrospective transport modeling for accurate source detection.
    Rosenthal WS; Eslinger PW; Schrom BT; Miley HS; Baxter DJ; Fast JD
    J Environ Radioact; 2022 Jun; 247():106849. PubMed ID: 35294912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of vertical radial plume mapping technique in measuring lagoon gas emissions.
    Viguria M; Ro KS; Stone KC; Johnson MH
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Apr; 65(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 25947209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uncertainty assessment of contaminant plume length estimates in heterogeneous aquifers.
    Beyer C; Bauer S; Kolditz O
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):73-95. PubMed ID: 16781794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the link between contaminant source release conditions and plume prediction uncertainty.
    de Barros FP; Nowak W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jul; 116(1-4):24-34. PubMed ID: 20541835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chlorinated ethene plume evolution after source thermal remediation: Determination of degradation rates and mechanisms.
    Murray AM; Ottosen CB; Maillard J; Holliger C; Johansen A; Brabæk L; Kristensen IL; Zimmermann J; Hunkeler D; Broholm MM
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Dec; 227():103551. PubMed ID: 31526529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Subtidal variability of the Tagus river plume in winter 2013.
    Vaz N; Rodrigues JG; Mateus M; Franz G; Campuzano F; Neves R; Dias JM
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():1353-1362. PubMed ID: 30857099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.