These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33255493)

  • 1. Analysis of Impact of Rain Conditions on ADAS.
    Roh CG; Kim J; Im IJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 33255493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Driver's Intention of Lane Change by Augmenting Sensor Information Using Machine Learning Techniques.
    Kim IH; Bong JH; Park J; Park S
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jun; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28604582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
    Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
    Das A; Ghasemzadeh A; Ahmed MM
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():71-80. PubMed ID: 30876522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving Performance and Technology Acceptance Evaluation in Real Traffic of a Smartphone-Based Driver Assistance System.
    Voinea GD; Postelnicu CC; Duguleana M; Mogan GL; Socianu R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 32998252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deep Neuro-Vision Embedded Architecture for Safety Assessment in Perceptive Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: The Pedestrian Tracking System Use-Case.
    Rundo F; Conoci S; Spampinato C; Leotta R; Trenta F; Battiato S
    Front Neuroinform; 2021; 15():667008. PubMed ID: 34393746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: A national survey of teen and parent perceptions.
    Hannan C; Palumbo AJ; Fisher Thiel MC; Weiss E; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S84-S90. PubMed ID: 30335514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using ADAS to Future-Proof Roads-Comparison of Fog Line Detection from an In-Vehicle Camera and Mobile Retroreflectometer.
    Storsæter AD; Pitera K; McCormack E
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33802388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driving Difficulties and Preferences of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems by Older Drivers With Central Vision Loss.
    Xu J; Hutton A; Dougherty BE; Bowers AR
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 12(10):7. PubMed ID: 37801300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing Lane Departure Warning System towards AI-Centered Autonomous Vehicles.
    Jeong S; Ko J; Lee S; Kang J; Kim Y; Park SY; Mun S
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Apr; 24(8):. PubMed ID: 38676119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring the Driver's Lane Change Intention through LiDAR-Based Environment Analysis Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Díaz-Álvarez A; Clavijo M; Jiménez F; Serradilla F
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33440897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: Teen and parent impressions, perceived need, and intervention preferences.
    Weiss E; Fisher Thiel M; Sultana N; Hannan C; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S120-S124. PubMed ID: 29584476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of Driver's Danger Level when Accessing the Center Console for Safe Driving.
    Lee HS; Oh S; Jo D; Kang BY
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30309040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver's behavioral adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): the case of speed and time headway.
    Bianchi Piccinini GF; Rodrigues CM; Leitão M; Simões A
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():77-84. PubMed ID: 24913490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.
    Hölzl R; Steckhan L; Lehsing C; Savage SW; Bowers AR
    Safety (Basel); 2021 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 34765674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behind-The-Scenes (BTS): Wiper-Occlusion Canceling for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems in Adverse Rain Environments.
    Jhung J; Kim S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34884085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rainfall effect on single-vehicle crash severities using polychotomous response models.
    Jung S; Qin X; Noyce DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jan; 42(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 19887162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():289-298. PubMed ID: 31177040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating rear-end collision avoidance behavior under varied foggy weather conditions: A study using advanced driving simulator and survival analysis.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Liu S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105499. PubMed ID: 32199158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.