These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33255550)

  • 1. Investigating Italian Consumer Preferences for Different Characteristics of Provolone Valpadana Using the Conjoint Analysis Approach.
    Sampalean NI; de-Magistris T; Rama D
    Foods; 2020 Nov; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33255550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of extrinsic attributes on liking of cottage cheese.
    Hubbard EM; Jervis SM; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 26519972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer insights on prepackaged Cheddar cheese shreds using focus groups, conjoint analysis, and qualitative multivariate analysis.
    Speight KC; Schiano AN; Harwood WS; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):6971-6986. PubMed ID: 31155259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumer Preferences for Cheese Products with Quality Labels: The Case of Parmigiano Reggiano and Comté.
    Menozzi D; Yeh CH; Cozzi E; Arfini F
    Animals (Basel); 2022 May; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 35625145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer desires and perceptions of lactose-free milk.
    Rizzo PV; Harwood WS; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Aug; 103(8):6950-6966. PubMed ID: 32505391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer Preference Analysis on Attributes of Milk Tea: A Conjoint Analysis Approach.
    Ong AKS; Prasetyo YT; Libiran MADC; Lontoc YMA; Lunaria JAV; Manalo AM; Miraja BA; Young MN; Chuenyindee T; Persada SF; Perwira Redi AAN
    Foods; 2021 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 34203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer preference analysis on the attributes of samgyeopsal Korean cuisine and its market segmentation: Integrating conjoint analysis and K-means clustering.
    Ong AKS; Prasetyo YT; Esteller AJD; Bruno JE; Lagorza KCO; Oli LET; Chuenyindee T; Thana K; Persada SF; Nadlifatin R
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281948. PubMed ID: 36795718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consumer Perception of Retail Pork Bacon Attributes Using Adaptive Choice-based Conjoint Analysis and Maximum Differential Scaling.
    McLean KG; Hanson DJ; Jervis SM; Drake MA
    J Food Sci; 2017 Nov; 82(11):2659-2668. PubMed ID: 29058811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer perception of natural hot-pepper cheeses.
    Racette CM; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2166-2179. PubMed ID: 34955270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Product reformulation in the context of nutritional warning labels: Exploration of consumer preferences towards food concepts in three food categories.
    Ares G; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Antúnez L; Machín L; Vidal L; Giménez A
    Food Res Int; 2018 May; 107():669-674. PubMed ID: 29580533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer perception of restaurant and ready-to-eat cheese dips.
    Best AR; Racette CM; Drake M
    J Food Sci; 2023 Apr; 88(4):1672-1683. PubMed ID: 36847448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High hopes for front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels? A conjoint analysis on the trade-offs between a FOP label, nutrition claims, brand and price for different consumer segments.
    Godden E; Thornton L; Avramova Y; Dens N
    Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106356. PubMed ID: 36309232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliciting Egg Consumer Preferences for Organic Labels and Omega 3 Claims in Italy and Hungary.
    Yeh CH; Menozzi D; Török Á
    Foods; 2020 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32882950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer perception of smoked Cheddar cheese.
    Del Toro-Gipson RS; Rizzo PV; Hanson DJ; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):1560-1575. PubMed ID: 33309346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of quality labels on the formation of preferences of lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study.
    Bernabéu R; Rabadán A; El Orche NE; Díaz M
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():129-133. PubMed ID: 28968556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do Consumers Want More Nutritional and Health Information on Wine Labels? Insights from the EU and USA.
    Annunziata A; Pomarici E; Vecchio R; Mariani A
    Nutrients; 2016 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 27399767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumer Attitudes and Preference Exploration towards Fresh-Cut Salads Using Best-Worst Scaling and Latent Class Analysis.
    Massaglia S; Merlino VM; Borra D; Bargetto A; Sottile F; Peano C
    Foods; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31766119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer Preference Heterogeneity Evaluation in Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Decisions Using the Best-Worst Approach.
    Massaglia S; Borra D; Peano C; Sottile F; Merlino VM
    Foods; 2019 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 31323883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the effect of label attributes over the purchase intention of a cashew nut functional beverage using conjoint analysis.
    Cabral Rebouças M; do Carmo Passos Rodrigues M; Burnier Arcanjo Ferreira B; Maria de Freitas S
    Food Sci Technol Int; 2021 Mar; 27(2):164-171. PubMed ID: 32678681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?
    McCarthy KS; Parker M; Ameerally A; Drake SL; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6125-6138. PubMed ID: 28551193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.