These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33256916)

  • 1. Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people.
    Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Oltramari PVP; Freire Fernandes TM; de Almeida MR; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):840-848. PubMed ID: 33256916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likert scale vs visual analog scale for assessing facial pleasantness.
    Dourado GB; Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Pedron Oltramari PV; Freire Fernandes TM; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):844-852. PubMed ID: 34593260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pleasantness of facial profile and its correlation with soft tissue cephalometric parameters: Perception of orthodontists and lay people.
    Marchiori GE; Sodré LO; da Cunha TCR; Torres FC; Rosário HD; Paranhos LR
    Eur J Dent; 2015; 9(3):352-355. PubMed ID: 26430362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment.
    Rocha AD; Casteluci CEVF; Ferreira FPC; Conti AC; Almeida MR; Almeida-Pedrin RR
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e003. PubMed ID: 32022222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons for Indian facial profiles: A cross-sectional study.
    Reddy H; Singla R; Singla N; Natarajan M; Singhal DK
    F1000Res; 2023; 12():953. PubMed ID: 39372260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthodontists and lay people rate masculine soft tissue profiles similarly but feminine soft tissue profiles differently.
    Einy S; Miri T; Katzhendler E; Aizenbud D; Emanuela K; Zaslansky P
    Quintessence Int; 2021; 52(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32954390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of facial pleasantness in patients with complete and unilateral cleft lip and palate rehabilitated and submitted to orofacial harmonization.
    Fangueiro DG; Garib DG; Conti ACCF; Largura L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(1):e2423115. PubMed ID: 38567921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons.
    Souza DB; Oliveira AI; Gouvêa GR; Santamaria-Jr M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e2220519. PubMed ID: 36074432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria.
    Melo AR; Conti ACCF; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Didier V; Valarelli DP; Capelozza Filho L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Feb; 22(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 28444021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of facial esthetics in long-faced white Brazilian middle school students.
    da Silva Goulart M; Filho LC; Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti A; Almeida Pedrin RR; de Miranda Ladewig V; Cardoso MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):812-818. PubMed ID: 31153501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
    Yang X; Yi Y; Yang S; Xue C; Wang Y; Chen M; Han X; Bai D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):532-6. PubMed ID: 25668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.