177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33257218)
1. Prognostic capabilities and clinical utility of cell cycle progression testing, prostate imaging reporting and data system, version 2, and clinicopathologic data in management of localized prostate cancer.
Morris DS; Woods JS; Edwards B; Lenz L; Logan J; Flake DD; Mabey B; Bishoff JT; Cohen T; Stone S
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):366.e19-366.e28. PubMed ID: 33257218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Prognostic Utility of the Cell Cycle Progression Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in African American and Non-African American Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.
Canter DJ; Reid J; Latsis M; Variano M; Halat S; Rajamani S; Gurtner KE; Sangale Z; Brawer M; Stone S; Bardot S
Eur Urol; 2019 Mar; 75(3):515-522. PubMed ID: 30391079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease?
Kim H; Pak S; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Kim M; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Feb; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31640913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score generated from needle biopsy in men treated with definitive therapy.
Canter DJ; Freedland S; Rajamani S; Latsis M; Variano M; Halat S; Tward J; Cohen T; Stone S; Schlomm T; Bishoff J; Bardot S
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Mar; 23(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 31243337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of a cell-cycle progression score in men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance after MRI-guided prostate biopsy--a pilot study.
Arsov C; Jankowiak F; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Quentin M; Schimmöller L; Blondin D; Antoch G; Albers P
Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2459-66. PubMed ID: 24778061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic utility of biopsy-derived cell cycle progression score in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy: implications for treatment guidance.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi MR; Bishoff JT; Freedland SJ; Reid J; Brawer M; Stone S; Schlomm T; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):808-814. PubMed ID: 28481440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Provides Independent Information on Adverse Pathology in the Setting of Combined Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsy.
Salmasi A; Said J; Shindel AW; Khoshnoodi P; Felker ER; Sisk AE; Grogan T; McCullough D; Bennett J; Bailey H; Lawrence HJ; Elashoff DA; Marks LS; Raman SS; Febbo PG; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2018 Sep; 200(3):564-572. PubMed ID: 29524506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
Martin DT; Ghabili K; Levi A; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC
Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():64-72. PubMed ID: 30552940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term follow-up results of multiparametric prostate MRI and the prognostic value of PI-RADS: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Önder Ö; Ayva M; Yaraşır Y; Gürler V; Yazıcı MS; Akdoğan B; Karaosmanoğlu AD; Karçaaltıncaba M; Özmen MN; Akata D
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2024 May; 30(3):139-151. PubMed ID: 37724756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients.
Alessi S; Pricolo P; Summers P; Femia M; Tagliabue E; Renne G; Bianchi R; Musi G; De Cobelli O; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Bellomi M; Petralia G
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5478-5487. PubMed ID: 30887199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Significance for Long-Term Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer: Evaluation with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.
Kim R; Kim CK; Park JJ; Kim JH; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 30672165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of relationships between the final Gleason score, PI-RADS v2 score, ADC value, PSA level, and tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer.
Gündoğdu E; Emekli E; Kebapçı M
Radiol Med; 2020 Sep; 125(9):827-837. PubMed ID: 32266690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Krelle M; Gavin D; Koschel S; Aluwihare K; Sutherland T; Skinner S; Brennan J; Wong LM; Louie-Johnsun M
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 30714285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
Hoffmann R; Logan C; O'Callaghan M; Gormly K; Chan K; Foreman D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29188489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
