These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33257967)

  • 41. Predictive efficacy of the Braden Q Scale for pediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment in the PICU: a meta-analysis.
    Chun X; Lin Y; Ma J; He J; Ye L; Yang H
    Pediatr Res; 2019 Oct; 86(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 31216569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Predictive power of the Braden scale for pressure sore risk in adult critical care patients: a comprehensive review.
    Cox J
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(6):613-21; quiz 622-3. PubMed ID: 22948495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pressure Injury Risk Assessment and Prevention in Patients With COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Alderden J; Kennerly SM; Cox J; Yap TL
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2022 Jun; 33(2):173-185. PubMed ID: 35657764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Enhancing Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment in acutely ill adult veterans.
    Cowan LJ; Stechmiller JK; Rowe M; Kairalla JA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 22304370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A simplified BRADEN scale for the risk of developing pressure injuries.
    Guimarães MCSES; Ruther DH; Zambelli R; Severo DS; Silva HPD; Reys AD; Silva FAOB; Pedro SDS; Silva D; Navarro TP
    Nurs Crit Care; 2024 Jan; 29(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 37125530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
    Lima-Serrano M; González-Méndez MI; Martín-Castaño C; Alonso-Araujo I; Lima-Rodríguez JS
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 28215408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Validity study of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI)].
    González-Ruiz JM; Núñez-Méndez P; Balugo-Huertas S; Navarro-de la Peña L; García-Martín MR
    Enferm Intensiva; 2008; 19(3):123-29, quiz 130-1. PubMed ID: 18840327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Braden Scale and Norton Scale modified by INSALUD in an acute care hospital: validity and cutoff point.
    González-Ruiz JM; Sebastián-Viana T; Losa-Iglesias ME; Lema-Lorenzo I; Crespo FJ; Martín-Merino G; García-Martín MR; Velayos-Rodríguez E; Nogueiras-Quintas CG
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 27(11):506-11. PubMed ID: 25325227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predicting the risk of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients.
    Carlson EV; Kemp MG; Shott S
    Am J Crit Care; 1999 Jul; 8(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 10392227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Determining Pressure Injury Risk on Admission to Inpatient Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the FIM, Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale, and Braden Scale.
    Flett HM; Delparte JJ; Scovil CY; Higgins J; Laramée MT; Burns AS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 100(10):1881-1887. PubMed ID: 31054293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Predictive Value of Braden Risk Factors in Pressure Ulcers of Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury.
    Sadeghi Fazel F; Derakhshanrad N; Yekaninejad MS; Vosoughi F; Derakhshanrad A; Saberi H
    Acta Med Iran; 2018 Jan; 56(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 29436796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
    Fulbrook P; Anderson A
    J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predicting the Risk for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers in Critical Care Patients.
    Deng X; Yu T; Hu A
    Crit Care Nurse; 2017 Aug; 37(4):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 28765361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.
    Bergstrom N; Braden B; Kemp M; Champagne M; Ruby E
    Nurs Res; 1998; 47(5):261-9. PubMed ID: 9766454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prediction Model for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcer Development: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Hyun S; Moffatt-Bruce S; Cooper C; Hixon B; Kaewprag P
    JMIR Med Inform; 2019 Jul; 7(3):e13785. PubMed ID: 31322127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
    He W; Liu P; Chen HL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Braden Scale in pressure ulcer risk assessment.
    Jansen RCS; Silva KBA; Moura MES
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2020; 73(6):e20190413. PubMed ID: 32785503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.
    Feuchtinger J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17883663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Retrospective, Descriptive, Comparative Study to Identify Patient Variables That Contribute to the Development of Deep Tissue Injury Among Patients in Intensive Care Units.
    Kirkland-Kyhn H; Teleten O; Wilson M
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Feb; 63(2):42-47. PubMed ID: 28267682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.