396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33258007)
1. Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007-2017-insights from a national registry.
Lang CN; Kaier K; Zotzmann V; Stachon P; Pottgiesser T; von Zur Muehlen C; Zehender M; Duerschmied D; Schmid B; Bode C; Wengenmayer T; Staudacher DL
Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 110(9):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 33258007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Yeh RW
EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(18):e2152-e2159. PubMed ID: 29400657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United States (from the National Inpatient Sample).
Alkhalil A; Hajjar R; Ibrahim H; Ruiz CE
Am J Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 124(10):1615-1620. PubMed ID: 31522773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Garan AR; Takeda K; Salna M; Vandenberge J; Doshi D; Karmpaliotis D; Kirtane AJ; Takayama H; Kurlansky P
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May; 8(9):e012171. PubMed ID: 31041870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.
Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA
Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical circulatory support for early surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock.
Vondran M; Wehbe MS; Etz C; Ghazy T; Rastan AJ; Borger MA; Schroeter T
Artif Organs; 2021 Mar; 45(3):244-253. PubMed ID: 32857884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in utilization of mechanical circulatory support in patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Patel NJ; Patel N; Bhardwaj B; Golwala H; Kumar V; Atti V; Arora S; Patel S; Patel N; Hernandez GA; Badheka A; Alfonso CE; Cohen MG; Bhatt DL; Kapur NK
Resuscitation; 2018 Jun; 127():105-113. PubMed ID: 29674141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiogenic shock during heart failure hospitalizations: Age-, sex-, and race-stratified trends in incidence and outcomes.
Yandrapalli S; Sanaani A; Harikrishnan P; Aronow WS; Frishman WH; Lanier GM; Ahmed A; Fonarow GC
Am Heart J; 2019 Jul; 213():18-29. PubMed ID: 31078113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis.
Zhang Q; Han Y; Sun S; Zhang C; Liu H; Wang B; Wei S
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35152887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
Enezate T; Eniezat M; Thomas J
Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 31204034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of temporary mechanical circulatory support before heart transplantation and impact on post-transplant outcomes.
Ouyang D; Gulati G; Ha R; Banerjee D
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2018 Sep; 37(9):1060-1066. PubMed ID: 29907499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sociodemographic differences in utilization and outcomes for temporary cardiovascular mechanical support in the setting of cardiogenic shock.
Thangam M; Luke AA; Johnson DY; Amin AP; Lasala J; Huang K; Joynt Maddox KE
Am Heart J; 2021 Jun; 236():87-96. PubMed ID: 33359779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes.
Varshney AS; Berg DD; Katz JN; Baird-Zars VM; Bohula EA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Guo J; Lawler PR; Nativi-Nicolau J; Sinha SS; Teuteberg JJ; van Diepen S; Morrow DA;
JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 5(6):703-708. PubMed ID: 32293644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Stabilizes and Potentially Rescues Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.
Tongers J; Sieweke JT; Kühn C; Napp LC; Flierl U; Röntgen P; Schmitto JD; Sedding DG; Haverich A; Bauersachs J; Schäfer A
Circ Heart Fail; 2020 Mar; 13(3):e005853. PubMed ID: 32164431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
