These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33258981)
21. A comparative assessment of failures and periodontal health between 2 mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial. Węgrodzka E; Kornatowska K; Pandis N; Fudalej PS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):494-502.e1. PubMed ID: 34384638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Predictors of re-consultation and impact of the retainer on relapse and debonding rate ten years after removal of orthodontic appliances]. De Launay L; Goumy MJ; Subtil F; Gebeile-Chauty S Orthod Fr; 2020 Oct; 91(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 33146613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Twelve-year follow-up of mandibular incisor stability: Comparison between two bonded lingual orthodontic retainers. Schütz-Fransson U; Lindsten R; Bjerklin K; Bondemark L Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 27552722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of different bonded retainer wires on tooth mobility immediately after orthodontic treatment. Kučera J; Marek I; Littlewood SJ Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):178-186. PubMed ID: 34374751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Antibacterial activity and debonding force of different lingual retainers bonded with conventional composite and nanoparticle containing composite: An in vitro study. Kotta M; Gorantla S; Muddada V; Lenka RR; Karri T; Kumar S; Tivanani M J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Jun; 9(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 32672659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is there a difference among different bonded retainers in regard to survival rate? Mheissen S; Spineli LM Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):156-157. PubMed ID: 36526843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 1. Stability, retainer failure, and participant satisfaction. Jasim ES; Kadhum AS Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39206494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional microanalysis of tooth movement during the first 6 months of orthodontic double retention. Jedliński M; Tandecka K; Grocholewicz K; Janiszewska-Olszowska J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):143-160. PubMed ID: 37815779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Displacement of teeth without and with bonded fixed orthodontic retainers: 3D analysis using triangular target frames and optoelectronic motion tracking device. Chakroun F; Colombo V; Lie Sam Foek D; Gallo LM; Feilzer A; Özcan M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():175-180. PubMed ID: 29906672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers : A prospective short-term study. Kartal Y; Kaya B; Polat-Özsoy Ö J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jan; 82(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32780168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial. Alrawas MB; Kashoura Y; Tosun Ö; Öz U Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 May; 24(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 32865325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment. Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Sauget E; Covell DA; Boero RP; Lieber WS Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 9188967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment. Bjering R; Birkeland K; Vandevska-Radunovic V Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 25140669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers. Arash V; Teimoorian M; Farajzadeh Jalali Y; Sheikhzadeh S Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 2-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Egli F; Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 28024770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A prospective randomized controlled trial on the comparative clinical efficiency and hygiene of a ceramic inter locking retainer and a flexible spiral wire bonded retainer. Sinha A; Sonar S; Batra P; Raghavan S Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 34810385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of three orthodontic retainers on periodontal pathogens and periodontal parameters. Li B; Lu C; Yao X; Wu X; Wu G; Zeng X Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20709. PubMed ID: 38001102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]