These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33259084)

  • 1. Women report more severe sensations from 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation than men.
    Workman CD; Fietsam AC; Kamholz J; Rudroff T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 53(8):2696-2702. PubMed ID: 33259084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Tolerability and Efficacy of 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Leg Muscle Fatigability.
    Workman CD; Kamholz J; Rudroff T
    Brain Sci; 2019 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 31878058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tolerability and blinding of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation among older adults at intensities of up to 4 mA per electrode.
    El Jamal C; Harrie A; Rahman-Filipiak A; Iordan AD; DaSilva AF; Ploutz-Snyder R; Khadr L; Vesia M; Bikson M; Hampstead BM
    Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(5):1328-1335. PubMed ID: 37660936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
    J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults.
    Turi Z; Csifcsák G; Boayue NM; Aslaksen P; Antal A; Paulus W; Groot J; Hawkins GE; Forstmann B; Opitz A; Thielscher A; Mittner M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 50(8):3261-3268. PubMed ID: 30888090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps.
    Reckow J; Rahman-Filipiak A; Garcia S; Schlaefflin S; Calhoun O; DaSilva AF; Bikson M; Hampstead BM
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):991-997. PubMed ID: 29784589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel tDCS sham approach based on model-driven controlled shunting.
    Neri F; Mencarelli L; Menardi A; Giovannelli F; Rossi S; Sprugnoli G; Rossi A; Pascual-Leone A; Salvador R; Ruffini G; Santarnecchi E
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(2):507-516. PubMed ID: 31926812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.
    Ammann C; Lindquist MA; Celnik PA
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 28420581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex.
    Mosayebi Samani M; Agboada D; Jamil A; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Cortex; 2019 Oct; 119():350-361. PubMed ID: 31195316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating a Sham Condition for Use in High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Garnett EO; den Ouden DB
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):551-4. PubMed ID: 25686528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.
    Strube W; Bunse T; Nitsche MA; Nikolaeva A; Palm U; Padberg F; Falkai P; Hasan A
    Physiol Rep; 2016 Aug; 4(15):. PubMed ID: 27495298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.
    Paneri B; Adair D; Thomas C; Khadka N; Patel V; Tyler WJ; Parra L; Bikson M
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):740-754. PubMed ID: 27372844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK
    J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased leg muscle fatigability during 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation over the left motor cortex.
    Workman CD; Kamholz J; Rudroff T
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):333-343. PubMed ID: 31919540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation: participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2mA.
    O'Connell NE; Cossar J; Marston L; Wand BM; Bunce D; Moseley GL; De Souza LH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47514. PubMed ID: 23082174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety, Tolerability, Blinding Efficacy and Behavioural Effects of a Novel MRI-Compatible, High-Definition tDCS Set-Up.
    Gbadeyan O; Steinhauser M; McMahon K; Meinzer M
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 27108392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex on novice X-ray screening performance.
    Wagner J; Lo Monaco S; Contò F; Parrott D; Battelli L; Rusconi E
    Cortex; 2020 Nov; 132():1-14. PubMed ID: 32911230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No effect of tDCS of the primary motor cortex on isometric exercise performance or perceived fatigue.
    Wrightson JG; Twomey R; Yeung STY; Millet GY
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 52(2):2905-2914. PubMed ID: 31846516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
    Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.