These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33259519)

  • 1. The state of memory-matched distractor in working memory influence the visual attention.
    Long Q; Luo T; Zhang S; Jiang Y; Hu N; Gu Y; Xu P; Chen A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242721. PubMed ID: 33259519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological evidence supports the role of sustained visuospatial attention in maintaining visual WM contents.
    Liang T; Chen X; Ye C; Zhang J; Liu Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():54-62. PubMed ID: 31639381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.
    Konstantinou N; Beal E; King JR; Lavie N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 25085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory.
    Kumar S; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(2):307-17. PubMed ID: 19691812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bindings in working memory: The role of object-based attention.
    Gao Z; Wu F; Qiu F; He K; Yang Y; Shen M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):533-552. PubMed ID: 27924444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.
    Hinault T; Blacker KJ; Gormley M; Anderson BA; Courtney SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 30460482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-Modal Decoding of Neural Patterns Associated with Working Memory: Evidence for Attention-Based Accounts of Working Memory.
    Majerus S; Cowan N; Péters F; Van Calster L; Phillips C; Schrouff J
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jan; 26(1):166-79. PubMed ID: 25146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.
    LaRocque JJ; Riggall AC; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4881-4890. PubMed ID: 27702811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The success of the representation maintenance affects the memory-guided search processing: an ERP study.
    Wang M; Yang P; Jin Z; Zhang J; Li L
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):503-509. PubMed ID: 30465144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.
    Whitehead PS; Ooi MM; Egner T; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 30938591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory guidance in distractor suppression is governed by the availability of cognitive control.
    Wen W; Hou Y; Li S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 29582389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual working memory representations guide the detection of emotional faces: An ERP study.
    Fan L; Ding C; Guo R; Xu M; Diao L; Yang D
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():1-8. PubMed ID: 26731647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence that top-down knowledge controls working memory processing for subsequent visual search.
    Kawashima T; Matsumoto E
    Neuroreport; 2016 Mar; 27(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 26872100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.
    Hakim N; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Jun; 31(7):3323-3337. PubMed ID: 33675357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.
    Kiyonaga A; Dowd EW; Egner T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 29(12):2011-2024. PubMed ID: 28777056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.