BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33259756)

  • 1. Habitat loss alters effects of intransitive higher-order competition on biodiversity: a new metapopulation framework.
    Li Y; Bearup D; Liao J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 287(1940):20201571. PubMed ID: 33259756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks?
    Laird RA; Schamp BS
    Ecology; 2008 Jan; 89(1):237-47. PubMed ID: 18376565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness.
    Soliveres S; Maestre FT; Ulrich W; Manning P; Boch S; Bowker MA; Prati D; Delgado-Baquerizo M; Quero JL; Schöning I; Gallardo A; Weisser W; Müller J; Socher SA; García-Gómez M; Ochoa V; Schulze ED; Fischer M; Allan E
    Ecol Lett; 2015 Aug; 18(8):790-798. PubMed ID: 26032242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence.
    Gallien L; Zimmermann NE; Levine JM; Adler PB
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Jul; 20(7):791-800. PubMed ID: 28547799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Competitive mechanism of non - predator - prey metapopulation system based on competition and dispersal ability].
    Liang R; Lin Z
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2006 Jun; 17(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 16964928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences.
    Godoy O; Stouffer DB; Kraft NJB; Levine JM
    Ecology; 2017 May; 98(5):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 28241383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Habitat heterogeneity mediates effects of individual variation on spatial species coexistence.
    Chen D; Liao J; Bearup D; Li Z
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1919):20192436. PubMed ID: 31964303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competition and species coexistence in a metapopulation model: can fast asymmetric migration reverse the outcome of competition in a homogeneous environment?
    Ngoc DN; de la Parra RB; Zavala MA; Auger P
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Sep; 266(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 20600132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Competitive intransitivity among species in biotic communities].
    Permogorskiĭ MS
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2014; 75(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 25771680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complex nonmonotonic responses of biodiversity to habitat destruction.
    Zhang H; Bearup D; Barabás G; Fagan WF; Nijs I; Chen D; Liao J
    Ecology; 2023 Dec; 104(12):e4177. PubMed ID: 37782819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dispersal network heterogeneity promotes species coexistence in hierarchical competitive communities.
    Zhang H; Bearup D; Nijs I; Wang S; Barabás G; Tao Y; Liao J
    Ecol Lett; 2021 Jan; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 33029856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrasting Patterns of Species Richness and Functional Diversity in Bird Communities of East African Cloud Forest Fragments.
    Ulrich W; Lens L; Tobias JA; Habel JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0163338. PubMed ID: 27855174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Species coexistence, intransitivity, and topological variation in competitive tournaments.
    Laird RA; Schamp BS
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 18948120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diversity Increases Indirect Interactions, Attenuates the Intensity of Competition, and Promotes Coexistence.
    Aschehoug ET; Callaway RM
    Am Nat; 2015 Oct; 186(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 26655569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intransitive Stability Collapses Under the Influence of Dominant Competitors.
    Gallien L; Cavaliere MC; Grange MC; Munoz F; Münkemüller T
    Am Nat; 2024 Jul; 204(1):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 38857345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecological drift and competitive interactions predict unique patterns in temporal fluctuations of population size.
    Ulrich W; Puchałka R; Koprowski M; Strona G; Gotelli NJ
    Ecology; 2019 Apr; 100(4):e02623. PubMed ID: 30644544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction rules affect species coexistence in intransitive networks.
    Rojas-Echenique J; Allesina S
    Ecology; 2011 May; 92(5):1174-80. PubMed ID: 21661578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diversity begets diversity in competition for space.
    Maynard DS; Bradford MA; Lindner DL; van Diepen LTA; Frey SD; Glaeser JA; Crowther TW
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2017 May; 1(6):156. PubMed ID: 28812633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence.
    Laird RA; Schamp BS
    Am Nat; 2006 Aug; 168(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 16874628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controlling species densities in structurally perturbed intransitive cycles with higher-order interactions.
    Chatterjee S; Nag Chowdhury S; Ghosh D; Hens C
    Chaos; 2022 Oct; 32(10):103122. PubMed ID: 36319275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.