357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33259825)
1. Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.
Kruse J; Toledo P; Belton TB; Testani EJ; Evans CT; Grobman WA; Miller ES; Lange EMS
Am J Infect Control; 2021 Jun; 49(6):690-693. PubMed ID: 33259825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations.
van Ballegooie C; Hoang P
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2021 Apr; 69(4):1051-1056. PubMed ID: 33236778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.
Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA
Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability, Content, and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials on Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity in the Pediatric Population.
Freed K; Taylor MG; Toledo P; Kruse JH; Palanisamy A; Lange EMS
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e341-e347. PubMed ID: 36470295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.
Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM
Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readability, content, quality and accuracy assessment of internet-based patient education materials relating to labor analgesia.
Murphy J; Vaughn J; Gelber K; Geller A; Zakowski M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2019 Aug; 39():82-87. PubMed ID: 31000314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
Yilmaz Hanci S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health literacy in rotator cuff repair: a quantitative assessment of the understandability of online patient education material.
Gulbrandsen MT; O'Reilly OC; Gao B; Cannon D; Jesurajan J; Gulbrandsen TR; Phipatanakul WP
JSES Int; 2023 Nov; 7(6):2344-2348. PubMed ID: 37969518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Health Communication Assessment of Web-based Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient Education Materials.
Robbins R; Dudley KA; Monten KN; Le C; Hanes S; Patel SR; Bertisch SM
ATS Sch; 2022 Mar; 3(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 35634002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Web-Based Patient Educational Material on Osteosarcoma: Quantitative Assessment of Readability and Understandability.
Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Shamrock AG; Gao B; Hasan O; Miller BJ
JMIR Cancer; 2022 Mar; 8(1):e25005. PubMed ID: 35323117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.
Lee KC; Berg ET; Jazayeri HE; Chuang SK; Eisig SB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):180.e1-180.e8. PubMed ID: 30296407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Traditional Measures: Comparative Analysis and Limitations.
Nattam A; Vithala T; Wu TC; Bindhu S; Bond G; Liu H; Thompson A; Wu DTY
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e46346. PubMed ID: 37647115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understandability, actionability, and readability of online patient education materials about diabetes mellitus.
Lipari M; Berlie H; Saleh Y; Hang P; Moser L
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jan; 76(3):182-186. PubMed ID: 31408087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the Readability of the Online Patient Education Materials of Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Hanci V; Otlu B; Biyikoğlu AS
Crit Care Med; 2024 Feb; 52(2):e47-e57. PubMed ID: 37962133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
