These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33260060)

  • 1. Micromanipulation of single cells and fingerprints for forensic identification.
    Ostojic L; O'Connor C; Wurmbach E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102430. PubMed ID: 33260060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low copy number DNA profiling from isolated sperm using the aureka®-micromanipulation system.
    Schneider C; Müller U; Kilper R; Siebertz B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jul; 6(4):461-5. PubMed ID: 22155149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of fingerprint samples, testing various conditions, for forensic DNA identification.
    Ostojic L; Wurmbach E
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28063583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New cell separation technique for the isolation and analysis of cells from biological mixtures in forensic caseworks.
    Li CX; Wang GQ; Li WS; Huang JP; Ji AQ; Hu L
    Croat Med J; 2011 Jun; 52(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 21674825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single source DNA profile recovery from single cells isolated from skin and fabric from touch DNA mixtures in mock physical assaults.
    Farash K; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 29685301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recovery of single source DNA profiles from mixtures by direct single cell subsampling and simplified micromanipulation.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jan; 61(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 33357824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced genetic analysis of single human bioparticles recovered by simplified micromanipulation from forensic 'touch DNA' evidence.
    Farash K; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Mar; (97):. PubMed ID: 25867046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mucosal cell isolation and analysis from cellular mixtures of three contributors.
    Xu C; Feng L; Yang F; Jia J; Ji AQ; Hu L; Li CX
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):783-6. PubMed ID: 25677969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of single fingerprints in forensic DNA analysis.
    Ostojic L; Klempner SA; Patel RA; Mitchell AA; Axler-DiPerte GL; Wurmbach E
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3165-72. PubMed ID: 25098234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MtDNA typing of single-sperm cells isolated by micromanipulation.
    Pereira J; Neves R; Forat S; Huckenbeck W; Olek K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 21680273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ESDA®-Lite collection of DNA from latent fingerprints on documents.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():8-12. PubMed ID: 25479402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Targeted recovery of male cells in a male and female same-cell mixture.
    Hogg J; Vandepoele ACW; Zaccheo N; Schulte J; Schulz I; Dubois J; Frank M; Marciano MA
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1183-1197. PubMed ID: 38549494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laser microdissection separation of pure spermatozoa from epithelial cells for short tandem repeat analysis.
    Sanders CT; Sanchez N; Ballantyne J; Peterson DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):748-57. PubMed ID: 16882215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
    Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection.
    Sheth N; Swaminathan H; Gonzalez AJ; Duffy KR; Grgicak CM
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):727-738. PubMed ID: 33484330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of tape-lifts.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Paul Kirkbride K; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102292. PubMed ID: 32248081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic trapping of sperm cells from mock sexual assault samples.
    Clark CP; Xu K; Scott O; Hickey J; Tsuei AC; Jackson K; Landers JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():42-49. PubMed ID: 30954892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.