184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3326017)
1. Determining psychosis in retarded adults through psychological tests.
Eisner DA; Maibaum M
Psychol Rep; 1987 Dec; 61(3):789-90. PubMed ID: 3326017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-retest reliability of the Hand Test with institutionalized mentally retarded adults.
Stoner S
Psychol Rep; 1985 Feb; 56(1):272-4. PubMed ID: 3885284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual robustness of the nonrelationship between psychopathology and popular responses on the Hand Test and the Rorschach.
Peterson CA; Horowitz M
J Pers Assess; 1990; 54(1-2):415-8. PubMed ID: 2179522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the clinical utility of the Draw-a-Person Test.
Maloney MP; Glasser A
J Clin Psychol; 1982 Jan; 38(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 7035496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Psychological changes in a group of tuberculous patients examined by projective tests (Rorschach and TAT)].
SAMALE L
Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1954; 15(4-5):397-436. PubMed ID: 13218931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Projective methodologies.
Molish HB
Annu Rev Psychol; 1972; 23():577-614. PubMed ID: 4552210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental assessment of cognitive style in mentally retarded psychotics.
Kay SR
J Clin Psychol; 1977 Oct; 33(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 336649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing diagnostic validity of the TAT and a new picture projective test.
Sharkey KJ; Ritzler BA
J Pers Assess; 1985 Aug; 49(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 3900331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. M an active energy system correlating Rorschach M with ease of creativ expression.
Dudek SZ
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Oct; 32(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 4879255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The metamorphosis of projective methods.
Klopfer WG
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Oct; 32(5):402-4. PubMed ID: 4879248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of annihilation anxiety from projective tests.
Hurvich M; Benveniste P; Howard J; Coonerty S
Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Oct; 77(2):387-401. PubMed ID: 8247657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of projective test findings with older adults.
Panek PE; Wagner EE; Kennedy-Zwergel K
J Pers Assess; 1983 Dec; 47(6):562-82. PubMed ID: 6363672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias in postdiction from projective tests.
SOSKIN WF
J Abnorm Psychol; 1954 Jan; 49(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 13128963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Blind test interpretation to overcome student resistance to projective techniques courses.
Rader GE; Schill TR
J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 4575075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. AN ATTEMPT TO MEASURE SOME ASPECTS OF PERSONALITY IN YOUNG MEN WITH DUODENAL ULCER BY MEANS OF QUESTIONNAIRES AND A PROJECTIVE TEST.
KANTER VB; HAZELTON JE
J Psychosom Res; 1964 Dec; 8():297-309. PubMed ID: 14242400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hand test personality correlates of aging in institutionalized mentally retarded adults.
Panek PE; Spencer WB
Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Dec; 57(3 Pt 1):1021-2. PubMed ID: 6364033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of some "test dimensions" conceptions.
SEEMAN W; MARKS PA
J Proj Tech; 1962 Dec; 26():469-73. PubMed ID: 13987646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Projective methodologies.
Fisher S
Annu Rev Psychol; 1967; 18():165-90. PubMed ID: 5333546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CONTRIBUTION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING OF PARENTS TO THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CHILD.
EIDUSON BT; MEYER MM; LUCAS WB
J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1963 Dec; 27():387-417. PubMed ID: 14083247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical identification of compensatory structures on projective tests: a self psychological approach.
Silverstein ML
J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):517-36. PubMed ID: 11499462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
