212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33260758)
1. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage.
Balaya V; Guani B; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F; On Behalf Of The Senticol Group
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33260758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.
Chen X; Duan H; Liu P; Lin L; Ni Y; Li D; Dai E; Zhan X; Li P; Huo Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):121. PubMed ID: 35282114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the FIGO 2018 staging system of cervical cancer: Retrospective analysis of FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumor under 2 cm.
Takahashi M; Sakai K; Iwasa N; Wada M; Hino M; Kurahashi T; Ueno M; Nakagawa H
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 May; 47(5):1871-1877. PubMed ID: 33611822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.
Zeng J; Qu P; Hu Y; Sun P; Qi J; Zhao G; Gao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(16):e19714. PubMed ID: 32311956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oncologic outcome in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: Is tumor size important?
Tokalioglu AA; Kilic C; Oktar O; Kilic F; Cakir C; Yuksel D; Comert GK; Korkmaz V; Turan T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Feb; 49(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 36415110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complete Laparoscopic Type C2 Radical Surgery for Cervical Stump Cancer: No-Look and No-Touch Techniques.
Zhang K; Zhang Y; Wu H; Wu S; Cheng W; Luo C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38730117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Conization Specimens Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer? A SENTICOL Group Study.
Balaya V; Guani B; Mereaux J; Magaud L; Pache B; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Desseauve D; Mathevet P; Lécuru F; On Behalf Of The Senticol Group
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Oct; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 34771586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety analysis of non-radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 ~ IB1): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zeng S; Xiao S; Xu Y; Yang P; Hu C; Jin X; Liu L
Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1337752. PubMed ID: 38745744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer.
Pol FJ; Zusterzeel PL; van Ham MA; Kuijpers DA; Bulten J; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 26126782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study.
Ten Eikelder MLG; Hinten F; Smits A; Van der Aa MA; Bekkers RLM; IntHout J; Wenzel HHB; Zusterzeel PLM
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35804912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinico-pathological characteristics of patients with stage IB1-IB2 (FIGO 2018) uterine cervical cancer: a nationwide study in Japan.
Tsuji K; Shimada M; Takahashi F; Tokunaga H; Deura I; Yamaguchi S; Nakanishi T; Matsuo K; Yaegashi N; Mikami M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Aug; 26(8):1541-1552. PubMed ID: 34106355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stage Migration in Cervical Cancer Using the FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Retrospective Survival Analysis Using a Single-Institution Patient Cohort.
Vengaloor Thomas T; Reddy KK; Gandhi S; Nittala MR; Abraham A; Robinson W; Ridgway M; Packianathan S; Vijayakumar S
Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19289. PubMed ID: 34877225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early cervical adenocarcinoma: selection criteria for radical surgery.
Schorge JO; Lee KR; Lee SJ; Flynn CE; Goodman A; Sheets EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 94(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 10472864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operable Stages IB and II cervical carcinomas: a retrospective study comparing preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy and postoperative radiotherapy.
Atlan D; Touboul E; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Lefranc JP; Antoine JM; Jannet D; Lhuillier P; Uzan M; Huart J; Genestie C; Antoine M; Jamali M; Ganansia V; Milliez J; Uzan S; Blondon J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):780-93. PubMed ID: 12377330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative morbidity of radical trachelectomy with lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a French prospective multicentric cohort.
Balaya V; Lécuru F; Magaud L; Ngô C; Huchon C; Bats AS; Mathevet P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e34. PubMed ID: 30887756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Mohamud A; Høgdall C; Schnack T
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 35346512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
