133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33261412)
1. A binaural model implementing an internal noise to predict the effect of hearing impairment on speech intelligibility in non-stationary noises.
Vicente T; Lavandier M; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3305. PubMed ID: 33261412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modelling binaural unmasking and the intelligibility of speech in noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Vicente T; Buchholz JM; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3275. PubMed ID: 34852607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Lőcsei G; Pedersen JH; Laugesen S; Santurette S; Dau T; MacDonald EN
Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27601071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual differences in speech intelligibility at a cocktail party: A modeling perspective.
Lavandier M; Mason CR; Baltzell LS; Best V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):1076. PubMed ID: 34470293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Rana B; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired listeners using a physiologically inspired auditory model.
Zaar J; Carney LH
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108553. PubMed ID: 35750575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.
Bronkhorst AW; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3132-9. PubMed ID: 1474228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling Sluggishness in Binaural Unmasking of Speech for Maskers With Time-Varying Interaural Phase Differences.
Hauth CF; Brand T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517753547. PubMed ID: 29338577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Beutelmann R; Brand T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):331-42. PubMed ID: 16875230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Bronkhorst AW; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1374-83. PubMed ID: 2808911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
Summers V; Cord MT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a clinically viable spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting supra-threshold speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners.
Zaar J; Simonsen LB; Dau T; Laugesen S
Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108650. PubMed ID: 36463632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
