286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33261564)
1. Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients.
Craven S; Byrne F; Mahony R; Walsh JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):746. PubMed ID: 33261564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrapartum caesarean rates differ significantly between ethnic groups--relationship to induction.
Ismail KI; Marchocki Z; Brennan DJ; O'Donoghue K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Oct; 158(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21733613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
Dunne C; Da Silva O; Schmidt G; Natale R
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20085677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does an elective induction policy negatively impact on vaginal delivery rates? A 30-month review of an elective induction policy.
Loktionov D; McCarthy CM; Skehan MC
Ir J Med Sci; 2019 May; 188(2):563-567. PubMed ID: 30121814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of maternal age on intrapartum caesarean delivery rate in nulliparas with spontaneous labour.
Crequit S; Korb D; Schmitz T; Morin C; Sibony O
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 48(6):407-411. PubMed ID: 30797893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intervention rates in spontaneous term labour in low risk nulliparous women.
Cary AJ
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Feb; 30(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 2346451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of induction of labour in nulliparous women at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy by clinical indication: An observational study.
de Vries BS; Barratt A; McGeechan K; Tooher J; Wong E; Phipps H; Gordon A; Hyett JA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59(4):484-492. PubMed ID: 30588611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.
Zhao Y; Flatley C; Kumar S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 57(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28251626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery: using propensity scores to control confounding by indication.
Danilack VA; Dore DD; Triche EW; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1521-9. PubMed ID: 26411752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association between epidural analgesia and indications for intrapartum caesarean delivery in group 1 of the 10-group classification system at a tertiary maternity hospital, Shanghai, China: a retrospective cohort study.
Lin R; Shi P; Li H; Liu Z; Xu Z
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jun; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34187400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trial of labour in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.
de Castro H; Haas J; Schiff E; Sivan E; Yinon Y; Barzilay E
BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):940-5. PubMed ID: 26228895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?
Cheng YW; Sparks TN; Laros RK; Nicholson JM; Caughey AB
BJOG; 2012 Mar; 119(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 22251443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of Foley catheter induction among nulliparous women: a retrospective study.
Kruit H; Heikinheimo O; Ulander VM; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Nupponen I; Paavonen J; Rahkonen L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Oct; 15():276. PubMed ID: 26508361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention.
Holmes P; Oppenheimer LW; Wen SW
BJOG; 2001 Nov; 108(11):1120-4. PubMed ID: 11762649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective cohort study of mode of delivery among public and private patients in an integrated maternity hospital setting.
Murphy DJ; Fahey T
BMJ Open; 2013 Nov; 3(11):e003865. PubMed ID: 24277646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.
Mayne L; Liu C; Tanaka K; Amoako A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33938362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
Jonsson M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.
Davey MA; King J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():92. PubMed ID: 27121614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The association between induction of labour at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy and indication for caesarean delivery: An observational study.
de Vries BS; McGeechan K; Barratt A; Tooher J; Wong E; Phipps H; Gordon A; Hyett JA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Dec; 59(6):791-798. PubMed ID: 31287155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
